From: <hp...@we...> - 2022-06-23 13:09:45
|
René! Am 23.06.2022 um 10:57 schrieb René Jansen: > Well, let me strike that remark from the proceedings. Done. Halfway afore already. You probably noticed by the way I asked that I was not convinced. > It was a rather loose comment, based in the fact that on CMS and TSO you know there are records (F/V) because these are a part of data set organisation and access methods. With stream oriented file I/O there is a change that you mistake delimited strings for records. This most of the time is my own mistake (cr/cr/lf, tabs etc) and requires me to delimit and split. Ok, now I understand. This requires a 'deblock', not a 'sometimes split if needed', which I left out as too cynical suggestion, my questions had been ironical enough. But it leads to the issue of handling binary data in Pipelines which define records by content. Just two days ago I gave up to transfer binary content from an ooRexx variable to a NetRexx Pipe by address '' ... with ... -- assuming it could be an ooRexx-specific issue. My question was, how to get 'get' reading files binary. > I think restraint is always a good thing, except in fighting evil. LOL! Killing killers kills killing? > In this case, I think your scepticism should not be based on imprecise statements from my side. Your statement was not imprecise, it was the 'split' instead of 'deblock' that "framed" it unintelligible for me. Best, M. |