Re: [netrexx-pipelines] Migrate OS/2 pipelines to NetRexx Pipes

[Jeff H. <jb...@gm...>]

This seems to be a difference in the way 'unique multi' works between CMS
and NetRexx.

NetRexx:
nrws> pipe literal a b b c | split | unique w1 mult | cons
b
nrws>

CMS:
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 09:58:19
pipe literal a b b c | split | unique w1 mult | cons
b
b
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 09:59:17

CMS seems to pass all of the duplicate records, while NetRexx is only
passing one.


On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 8:43 AM René Jansen <rvj...@xs...> wrote:

> I cannot really see what is in front of this; a general problem is that
> sometimes you must inset a ’split’ into the pipeline because on other
> platforms than CMS a ‘record’ is less strictly defined.
>
> René.
>
> > On 21 Jun 2022, at 09:56, hp...@we... wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Sorry, could not resist and tried to migrate another program, less
> > pipelines, no GUI, much simpler.
> >
> >> ... !unique w2 mult!count lines! ...
> >
> > returns 1. I expected either 0 or 2 and above, but for sure not 1.
> >
> > Best,
> > M.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netrexx-pipelines mailing list
> > net...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netrexx-pipelines
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netrexx-pipelines mailing list
> net...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netrexx-pipelines
>


-- 
Jeff Henry