From: Rony G. F. <Ron...@wu...> - 2022-06-18 11:26:06
|
Hi Jeff, On 17.06.2022 20:44, Jeff Hennick wrote: > > My ERROR! I apologize. > > In getting NetRexx Pipelines stages updated last year, I did not look at the working LOCATE stage, > and did not inspect the IBM documentation to see it could be abbreviated to just L. I will supply > the needed short class files (one is needed for each "word": L, LO, LOC, etc. to call the LOCATE > stage) to do this. When I have time, I'll scan the IBM documentation to see if there are other > such stages I have missed. > having read the other postings just a little remark: it would be possible to have a single class for all of these variants and dynamically load the single class that should be employed for all of these abbreviations. So a mapping of the various abbreviations to the class would be needed and then that class gets dynamically loaded and used. ---rony P.S.: The ooRexx-Java bridge BSF4ooRexx, due to match [oo]Rexx dynamic nature does exactly that: demand/dynamically load Java classes. |