From: J L. T. <jlt...@ma...> - 2022-06-18 05:50:32
|
On 2022-06-17 17:39:10 hp...@we... wrote: > Hi! > > Am 17.06.2022 um 20:44 schrieb Jeff Hennick: > > My ERROR! I apologize. > > IMO no need to apologize, since the "documentation" of its > possible abbreviation is only a well hidden hint given by denoting > the stage name in upper case/lower case. This is shown in the CMS > help files, but not in the author's edition of 'the Book' as I > know it. > > In addition, editing using a fixed font like 'Courier New' the > lower case 'L' is very close to the number '1'. As such it is > regarded as bad habit using 'l' as variable name. Maybe same holds > true for the stage Locate. (Nonetheless I mostly use !strip!l to > remove blank lines.) > > Best, > M. Courier and Courier New, IMO, should be deprecated; there are plenty of other monospace fonts available that make the distinction clear, so clinging to an outmoded typeface designed for use on a mechanical device with limited number of keys seems like bad practice to me, and ought not outweigh the advantages of using abbreviations. I generally only use the abbreviations when writing pipelines 'on the fly' to be executed directly from the command line; when writing them in source code I use the fully expanded word because it better documents what the pipeline is doing. Leslie > > > In getting NetRexx Pipelines stages updated last year, I did not look at > > the working LOCATE stage, and did not inspect the IBM documentation to > > see it could be abbreviated to just L. I will supply the needed short > > class files (one is needed for each "word": L, LO, LOC, etc. to call the > > LOCATE stage) to do this. When I have time, I'll scan the IBM > > documentation to see if there are other such stages I have missed. > > > > Jeff Hennick > > _______________________________________________ > netrexx-pipelines mailing list > net...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netrexx-pipelines -- |