From: Terry F. <ta...@pg...> - 2022-01-25 07:51:19
|
Hello René, Trying out netrexx 4.02: * on Linux Mint 20.2 (debian distro) * with java 11 (!) [openjdk 11.0.13 2021-10-19 OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 11.0.13+8-Ubuntu- 0ubuntu1.20.04) OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 11.0.13+8-Ubuntu-0ubuntu1.20.04, mixed mode, sharing)} I got thru the basic install checks. Now I'm working my way thru the examples, I was able to compile and run rexxcps and testdate. But when I try to compile TreeViewSampleNRX I get the following: NetRexx portable processor 4.02-GA build 55-20220124-1319 Copyright (c) RexxLA, 2011,2022. All rights reserved. Parts Copyright (c) IBM Corporation, 1995,2008. Program TreeViewSampleNRX.nrx 10 +++ import javafx.collections. +++ ^^^^^^ +++ Warning: No classes found for import from package 'javafx.collections.' 16 +++ class TreeViewSampleNRX extends Application +++ ^^^^^^^^^^^ +++ Error: The class 'Application' cannot be found Compilation of 'TreeViewSampleNRX.nrx' failed [one error, one warning] I've installed both the OpenJava JDK and javafx (tho' I don't know how to verify that). In the olden days I used to be able to use the javadoc documentation to root around in the classes, but I cannot seem to find that now (after lots of googling/duckduckgo'ing). If you've got a pointer to javadoc for version 11, I might be able to limp along a little further 😉 On 2022-01-24 03:50, René Jansen wrote: > Dear developers, > > I am releasing 4.02 today as an (not marked as such) release candidate. This because there is some work to be done that will disrupt the opportunity to release 4.02 with a limited change set. > It contains the improvements as signalled in the release notes: > > NetRexx 4.02 GA [Januari 24, 2022] > > - for building NetRexx 4.0.2, Java 8 is now the lowest supported version > - tested and buildable from Java 8 up to and including Java 19ea > - including a fix for building on Java >=18 > - NetRexx option (no)annotate to turn off pass through annotations > - NetRexxC.jar and NetRexxF.jar now contain the ANT task for NetRexx > - The ANT task is modified for the new -annotations option > - The ANT task is modified for the new -address option > - ANT in the source code repository upgraded to 1.10 for building NetRexx > - a new chapter in the Programming Guide documenting two ANT scenarios > - new special word asknoecho to request console input without echo, e.g. for passwords > - NetRexx option MOD for generation of tailored source representations (Jason Martin) > - documentation additions and corrections (numerous) > - the base font for all documents is now an open source version of Times, due to font copyright issues > > Pipeline additions, improvements: > - fix for arguments on command stage > - DIGEST stage (SHA1, SHA256, SHA512, MD2, MD5 and more). > - a small CMS-compatibility improvement for stage LITERAL (Jeff Hennick) > - a new pipr script that is guaranteed to work in a Docker container (Marc Remes) > > Releasing it as a RC first leaves us with the option of recalling it when accidents happen, or do nothing when it is fine. It does not seem to contain high-risk issues like 4.01 - and that was very successful. > It will hit the website sometimes later today CET. > > For NetRexx 5 I would like to focus on: > > - solving the issue with output handles and multithreading that inhibits a well working JSR223 interface (René/Marc) > - a Streams implementation (closely related with the previous issue at the core, but also delivering a Classic Rexx compatible I/O model) (René/Marc) > - address enhancements (address with etc, integration with the OS Address package, outtrap): (Marc/René) > - CMS compatibility enhancements (if necessary; up to Jeff) > - command line versus .njp versus conformity (René) > - Android introduction, builds and examples (a lot, if not most work already done by Jason) > - fixing an issue with Annotations that is there but nobody noticed > > I announced the move to Github at the 2021 Symposium, but it is not so bad as it sounds: the main repo will be at SourceForge for the time being, but I will maintain a shadow repo at Github. The issue list, however, will be at Github (we never got around to use the one at SourceForge, so I will use all the project/issue/kanban/discussion fora infra at Github. Thanks to Jason we have the complete list of open issues from when we needed to move away from project Kenai. > > Please let me know your Github userid if I don’t know them yet. The ownership of the Github repo is with the RexxLA user, but I will mostly use my personal userid to do the work. If you are reading this list and are a ‘management/continuity’-user of the SF NetRexx repository, please be in touch to continue in this role, if you still want to do that. > > Best regards, > > René. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Netrexx-develop mailing list > Net...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netrexx-develop -- taf |