netmail-support — Support

[Netmail-support] Sent Items folder corruption

[Dennis d. <de...@ef...>]

We're running Netmail 3.5.2d on SLES9 and have an issue with two of our
users, (both accessing their accounts from the same computers).  They're
running IMAP on both of their accounts, and the problem we're
experiencing is apparent corruption in the "Sent Items" folder in their
user database.  They're using Outlook Express as their primary client. 

 
When the problem occurs, they are unable to send new mail.  If you log
into the webmail client, and try to access the "Sent Items" Folder, the
webmail client locks up, and you have to close the browser and re-log in
to the account.  If I access the user directory from the server consol
and delete the .idx file and log back into the account, it locks up
again so it's not a simple index corruption issue.  If I delete both the
.idx and .box files then the account can send mail again, but it doesn't
track the sent item.  If I delete the .box and .idx, log into the
webmail client, re-create the folder with the same name, and try to
access it, it locks up.  The only way to resolve the issue, is to create
a new folder with a different name than "Sent Items" like "Sent" or
"SentItems", re-configure the client and web interface to have that be
the Sent Items folder, and then it will track sent items until the next
time it becomes corrupted, at which point I have to make a new sent
items folder with a different name than either of the two previous ones.
 This issue has been duplicated with both of these users 3 times each.
 
I look forward to your input or responses.

Thanks,

Dennis deBruyn
debruyn at efca.org

[Netmail-support] SpamAssassin 3

[Pascal <Pas...@Us...>]

For those asking about SpamAssassin 3 support, unfortunately this is not
currently offered.  I do intend to fix this deficiency at some point,
but not today.  I will send a message to netmail-announce when
complete.  In an attempt to avoid future confusion I have added the
below to the documentation page:

Note that version numbers for this agent are synced to SpamAssassin. 
For example, v2.64 of this agent is designed for use with SpamAssassin
v2.64.

-Pascal

[Netmail-support] Spamassassin 3.02 & Hula?

[Greg W. <gw...@su...>]

Hi all,

 

If there's still any support for the spamd daemon that integrates with
Netmail there will be a lot more demand for it now that Netmail has been
released as open source in Hula.

 

I've built a Hula mail server and was counting on this version of spamd to
connect via Nmap but am getting an "Exec format error" when trying to start
Spamassassin 3.02 using spamd V 2.64.

 

I assume that Hula will respond to Nmap connections in the same way as
Netmail.

 

I'd really like to get this working so if anyone can offer any help I'd
really appreciate it.

 

Cheers,

 

Greg.

 

--

Greg Wilson

Systems & Network Administrator

Summerland Credit Union, Lismore

Ph 02 6620 7010

Fax 02 6622 6433

gw...@su...

 

--

This email and any attachments or annexure hereto are confidential and
subject to copyright and no use may be made of them without the consent of,
or pursuant to a written agreement with, The Summerland Credit Union
Limited. To the extent possible by law, The Summerland Credit Union
disclaims all liability in relation to any loss or damage suffered by the
use or reliance upon any information contained or in any attachment or
annexure hereto by any person.

 

[Netmail-support] mistake in first mail

[<ba...@os...>]

Spamassassin 3.0.3 ;)

[Netmail-support] spamassassin 303

[<ba...@os...>]

Hi all

 

Good job Pascal!

 

I'm wonder if it'll be spamd.raw for spamassassin 3.0.0

 

Witch of debian distribution do you use?

I prefer debian, but woody and sarge doesn't work with your latest spamd.raw
:-(

 

Bartosz from Poland

[Netmail-support] problem with 2.63b

[David S. <Ds...@pi...>]

I am testing this in my lab environment and am having an issue.  If I
use the -f switch, spam is flagged properly in the headers.  If I do not
use the -f switch, spam is not deleted as I expected it to be.  Am I
doing something wrong?  I have not changed anything except the default
spam score from 5.0 to 1.0 (for testing).

Thanks in advance for your time,





David Souders, CNE
Central Cluster Network Engineer
Technology Support Services
Plano I.S.D.
ext. 28766
469.752.8766
ds...@pi...

Re: [Netmail-support] spamd problems

[Gary F. <ga...@as...>]

Great, will test and let you know.

Will adding headers and Subject Rewrite be supported?  I would
definitely like to put a tag on the subject line so that a user can see
that it is SPAM.  Adding the spam score to the message would be nice
also.

I have been getting some feedback that some messages have been
duplicated 3, 4 or more times since adding the spam checking.  Thoughts?
 Related to the Bad Protocol: Bad Header problem?

I have a problem where I have netmail listening on a secondary IP
address on the NetWare server.  All requests to NetMail must be sent to
this IP address but all packets from the Netmail server come from the
primary address.  This has caused a problem and I had to modify spamd to
allow the request to come from the primary address.  Spamd (shipping)
has this option:

 -A host,..., --allowed-ips=..,..   Limit ip addresses which can
connect

that does not exist (as far as I can see) in this spamd.  I would like
to make an enhancement request to have this functionality added.

Is DCC, Razor and/or Pyzor supported?

Thanks,

Gary Faith

>>> Pascal <Pas...@Us...> 10/10/2004 8:40:22 PM >>>
The errors you are seeing are cosmetic.  That bug was fixed in CVS
some
time ago.  I just released 2.64 which contains the fix.

Adding headers other than X-SPAM-FLAG is not currently supported.

A version for 3.0 will be released, eventually.

-Pascal


Gary Faith wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Seems to be all of four of us on this list!
> 
> I keep getting this "bad protocol: header error" on a lot of
messages.
> What could be the problem?
> 
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2735]: debug: all '*To' addrs: trl@asdm
> ...
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2735]: debug: running meta tests; score
so
> far=4.801
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2735]: debug: is spam? score=6.518
> required=3
>
tests=DATE_MISSING,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2736]: logmsg: bad protocol: header
error:
> Ltrl trl 12^M
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2736]: bad protocol: header error: Ltrl
> trl 12^M
> 
> I am also trying to add SPAM headers to the message & subject (parts
of
> the local.cf file below) but the only thing that shows in the headers
is
> the X-SPAM-FLAG: Y.
> Why can't I get the other headers added?
> 
> *------------------------------------------------------------
> # Whether to change the subject of suspected spam
> rewrite_subject         1
> 
> # Text to prepend to subject if rewrite_subject is used
> subject_tag             {SPAM?}
> 
> #clear_headers
> #add_header all Checked 01-spam
> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
> add_header all Status _YESNO_, hits=_HITS_ required=_REQD_
> tests=_TESTS_
> #autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_
> add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
> add_header all Checker-Version SpamAssassin _VERSION_ (_SUBVERSION_)
on
> _HOSTNAME_
> #report
> 
> score   forged-HELO             3
> score   FORGED_RCVD_HELO        3
> score   FROM_AND_TO_SAME        3
>
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Is there going to be a spamd based on version 3.0?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gary Faith
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on
ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them.
Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find
out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl 
> _______________________________________________
> Netmail-support mailing list
> Net...@li... 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netmail-support 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on
ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give
us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out
more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl 
_______________________________________________
Netmail-support mailing list
Net...@li... 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netmail-support

Re: [Netmail-support] spamd problems

[Pascal <Pas...@Us...>]

The errors you are seeing are cosmetic.  That bug was fixed in CVS some
time ago.  I just released 2.64 which contains the fix.

Adding headers other than X-SPAM-FLAG is not currently supported.

A version for 3.0 will be released, eventually.

-Pascal


Gary Faith wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Seems to be all of four of us on this list!
> 
> I keep getting this "bad protocol: header error" on a lot of messages.
> What could be the problem?
> 
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2735]: debug: all '*To' addrs: trl@asdm
> ...
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2735]: debug: running meta tests; score so
> far=4.801
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2735]: debug: is spam? score=6.518
> required=3
> tests=DATE_MISSING,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2736]: logmsg: bad protocol: header error:
> Ltrl trl 12^M
> Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd[2736]: bad protocol: header error: Ltrl
> trl 12^M
> 
> I am also trying to add SPAM headers to the message & subject (parts of
> the local.cf file below) but the only thing that shows in the headers is
> the X-SPAM-FLAG: Y.
> Why can't I get the other headers added?
> 
> *------------------------------------------------------------
> # Whether to change the subject of suspected spam
> rewrite_subject         1
> 
> # Text to prepend to subject if rewrite_subject is used
> subject_tag             {SPAM?}
> 
> #clear_headers
> #add_header all Checked 01-spam
> add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
> add_header all Status _YESNO_, hits=_HITS_ required=_REQD_
> tests=_TESTS_
> #autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_
> add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
> add_header all Checker-Version SpamAssassin _VERSION_ (_SUBVERSION_) on
> _HOSTNAME_
> #report
> 
> score   forged-HELO             3
> score   FORGED_RCVD_HELO        3
> score   FROM_AND_TO_SAME        3
> *-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Is there going to be a spamd based on version 3.0?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gary Faith
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Netmail-support mailing list
> Net...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netmail-support

[Netmail-support] spamd problems

[Gary F. <ga...@as...>]

Hi all,

Seems to be all of four of us on this list=21

I keep getting this =22bad protocol: header error=22 on a lot of =
messages.=20
What could be the problem?

Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd=5B2735=5D: debug: all =27*To=27 addrs: =
trl=40asdm
...
Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd=5B2735=5D: debug: running meta tests; score =
so
far=3D4.801
Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd=5B2735=5D: debug: is spam? score=3D6.518
required=3D3
tests=3DDATE_MISSING,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_NO_CH=
ARSET,MIME_HTML_ONLY
Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd=5B2736=5D: logmsg: bad protocol: header =
error:
Ltrl trl 12=5EM
Oct  7 20:17:30 samson spamd=5B2736=5D: bad protocol: header error: Ltrl
trl 12=5EM


I am also trying to add SPAM headers to the message & subject (parts of
the local.cf file below) but the only thing that shows in the headers is
the X-SPAM-FLAG: Y.
Why can=27t I get the other headers added?

*------------------------------------------------------------
=23 Whether to change the subject of suspected spam
rewrite_subject         1

=23 Text to prepend to subject if rewrite_subject is used
subject_tag             =7BSPAM?=7D

=23clear_headers
=23add_header all Checked 01-spam
add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
add_header all Status _YESNO_, hits=3D_HITS_ required=3D_REQD_
tests=3D_TESTS_
=23autolearn=3D_AUTOLEARN_ version=3D_VERSION_
add_header all Level _STARS(*)_
add_header all Checker-Version SpamAssassin _VERSION_ (_SUBVERSION_) on
_HOSTNAME_
=23report

score   forged-HELO             3
score   FORGED_RCVD_HELO        3
score   FROM_AND_TO_SAME        3
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is there going to be a spamd based on version 3.0?

Thanks,

Gary Faith

[Netmail-support] wierdness

[Benjamin A. <be...@cu...>]

Hey Pascal,

I was experiencing some weirdness with the spamd code that I was 
modifying so I rolled back to your version of spamd.  Funny thing is I 
am seeing this weirdness with your code also.  Mail that I am sure is 
spam is getting chopped.  Here is an example of one I received today. 
The first couple lines of the original header are chopped off and the 
rest of the header is appended to the first part of the message.  I'm 
sure there was more in the body but it is gone.  In the spool directory 
were the two files related to this mail.  Both files (Cxxxxxx.in and 
Dxxxxxx.msg) were empty.  Here is the error in the maillog "Aug 25 
07:43:59 scratchy spamd[21157]: bad protocol: header error: 3000 
Unknown command^M".

Any thoughts?
Thanks
Ben


> From: "Robert Purvis" <kk...@ne...>
> Date: August 25, 2004 8:37:57 AM EDT
> To: be...@cu...
> Subject: Re: advertise to a few million...
> Reply-To: "Robert Purvis" <da...@ki...>
> X-Auth-No:
> Return-Path: <jp...@ad...>
> Received: from pD95E626E.dip.t-dialin.net not authenticated 
> [217.94.98.110] by skulker.org with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision:   
> 3.89  $ on Linux; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:43:53 -0400
> Received: from 77.92.209.156 by 217.94.98.110; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 
> 05:43:57 -0700
> Message-Id: <UEV...@ho...>
> X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 482
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--84622632826636960"
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> X-Priority: 3
> X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
> X-Ip: 214.166.192.78
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> "An Arthur Anderson Online Panel reveals that 85% of online users
>  say that broadcast email advertisements have led to a purchase."
>
> ----84622632826636960--
>
>
>
> X-Auth-No:
> Return-Path: <jp...@ad...>
> Received: from pD95E626E.dip.t-dialin.net not authenticated 
> [217.94.98.110]
> 	by skulker.org with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision:   3.89  $ on Linux;
> 	Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:43:53 -0400
> Received: from 77.92.209.156 by 217.94.98.110; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 
> 05:43:57 -0700
> Message-ID: <UEV...@ho...>
> From: "Robert Purvis" <kk...@ne...>
> Reply-To: "Robert Purvis" <da...@ki...>
> To: be...@cu...
> Subject: Re: advertise to a few million...
> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:37:57 +0200
> X-Mailer: AOL 7.0 for Windows US sub 482
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> 	boundary="--84622632826636960"
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-IP:214.166.192.78
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> "An Arthur Anderson Online Panel reveals that 85% of online users
>  say that broadcast email advertisements have led to a purchase."
>
> ----84622632826636960--
>
>
>

Re: [Netmail-support] spamAssassin Flag

[Pascal <Pas...@Us...>]

The check for "spamAssassin" to prevent looping is done against the
NetMail envelope.  This is completely separate from the message
headers.  The X-Spam-Flag does not exist in this envelope.  It is not
possible for the sender of an email to arbitrarily add data to the
message envelope.  It only exists in NetMail.

-Pascal


Benjamin Ackinclose wrote:
> 
> Hey guys,
> 
> I modified spamd to report back spam score on all messages.  That piece
> seems to work pretty well.  I was thinking that since all messages now
> have the X-Spam-Flag in the header, could I look for that to indicate
> whether this is the 1st or 2nd time through?  My thinking was/is yes
> but when I replaced the TspamAssassin value with X-Spam-Flag it is not
> picked up and the mail goes into a loop through nmap.
> 
> Also,  I seem to be getting some kind of html mail that gets through
> like it's not even checked.  It doesn't have the X-Spam-Flag score at
> all.  Wondering if they are catching on and including spamAssassin
> somewhere in the message so it gets passed.
> 
> Any thoughts will be appreciated.
> Thanks
> Ben
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Netmail-support mailing list
> Net...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netmail-support

[Netmail-support] spamAssassin Flag

[Benjamin A. <be...@cu...>]

Hey guys,

I modified spamd to report back spam score on all messages.  That piece 
seems to work pretty well.  I was thinking that since all messages now 
have the X-Spam-Flag in the header, could I look for that to indicate 
whether this is the 1st or 2nd time through?  My thinking was/is yes 
but when I replaced the TspamAssassin value with X-Spam-Flag it is not 
picked up and the mail goes into a loop through nmap.

Also,  I seem to be getting some kind of html mail that gets through 
like it's not even checked.  It doesn't have the X-Spam-Flag score at 
all.  Wondering if they are catching on and including spamAssassin 
somewhere in the message so it gets passed.

Any thoughts will be appreciated.
Thanks
Ben

Re: [Netmail-support] RE: ? re: anti-spam agent

[Pascal <Pas...@Us...>]

This bug is fixed in current CVS.  Click "browse CVS" from the project
home page to download the current version.

Most mail will match at least a couple rules.  Very few will actually
have a score of 0.0.

For info on the fields of the message envelope, see the development
notes page for a link to Novell's NetMail SDK.

-Pascal


Benjamin Ackinclose wrote:
> 
> Scott,
> I would be interested in looking at your changes.  It would help me to
> understand more.
> In the mean time here is the piece I am working on. Any thoughts would
> be appreciated.
> 
> my $line;
>      while ($line = $client->getline) {
> logmsg "check 1 $line : $_";
>          last if ($line =~ /^6021 /);
>          if ($line =~ /^TSpamAssassin/) {
>              print $client "QDONE\n";
>              $_ = $client->getline;
> logmsg "check 2 $_";
>              unless (/^1000 /) {
>                  protocol_error ($_);
>                  return 1;
>              }
>              $client->close;
>              return;
>          }
>          push(@envelope, $line);
> 
> Here are the results of a mail coming through
> 
> Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1
> Fli...@nm... - ^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 A2533532544^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 X1^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 Lb...@cu...
> rfc822;be...@cu... 8^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 6021 Get busy!^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 1
> Fli...@nm... - ^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 1 A2533532544^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 1 X1^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 1 TSpamAssassin^M  :
> Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 2 Lb...@cu...
> rfc822;be...@cu... 8^M
> Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: bad protocol: header error:
> Lb...@cu... rfc822;be...@cu... 8^M
> 
> I don't understand why check2 Lben... is where it is at.  To me it
> should be after X1 and before TSpam...  I am expecting the check2 value
> to be a successful QDONE return of 1000.  Any thoughts?
> 
> Also how about spam check values?  Will most normal mail be a 0.0?
> 
> Thanks
> Ben
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
> 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
> Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
> http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
> _______________________________________________
> Netmail-support mailing list
> Net...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netmail-support

[Netmail-support] RE: ? re: anti-spam agent

[Benjamin A. <be...@cu...>]

Scott,
I would be interested in looking at your changes.  It would help me to 
understand more.
In the mean time here is the piece I am working on. Any thoughts would 
be appreciated.

my $line;
     while ($line = $client->getline) {
logmsg "check 1 $line : $_";
         last if ($line =~ /^6021 /);
         if ($line =~ /^TSpamAssassin/) {
             print $client "QDONE\n";
             $_ = $client->getline;
logmsg "check 2 $_";
             unless (/^1000 /) {
                 protocol_error ($_);
                 return 1;
             }
             $client->close;
             return;
         }
         push(@envelope, $line);

Here are the results of a mail coming through

Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 
Fli...@nm... - ^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 A2533532544^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 X1^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 Lb...@cu... 
rfc822;be...@cu... 8^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9825]: check 1 6021 Get busy!^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:15 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 1 
Fli...@nm... - ^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 1 A2533532544^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 1 X1^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 1 TSpamAssassin^M  :
Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: check 2 Lb...@cu... 
rfc822;be...@cu... 8^M
Aug 12 14:36:16 scratchy spamd[9829]: bad protocol: header error: 
Lb...@cu... rfc822;be...@cu... 8^M

I don't understand why check2 Lben... is where it is at.  To me it 
should be after X1 and before TSpam...  I am expecting the check2 value 
to be a successful QDONE return of 1000.  Any thoughts?

Also how about spam check values?  Will most normal mail be a 0.0?

Thanks
Ben

[Netmail-support] ? re: anti-spam agent

[Benjamin A. <be...@cu...>]

Hi
RedHat 2.1
Netmail 3.52a
SpamAssassin 2.64

Part 1
I am trying to modify the anti-spam agent to report on all messages.  I 
have no experience with spamassassin or nmap so I will be learning as I 
go.  I have taken some code from the original spamd.raw and have it 
logging the spam score to syslog.  I would like to have it also report 
the score in the message so I don't have to log into my mail server.  I 
was first setting the X-SPAM-FLAG value to YES or NO depending on 
whether it is spam or not.  Then I will figure out how to insert the 
spam score.  The flag piece works fine but what I found was during the 
second check when it looks for SpamAssassin in the message and then 
executes the QDONE command it seems to return the local email address 
instead of the QDONE return code of 1000 causing the return test to 
fail.  I guess it doesn't really matter because it is exiting anyways 
but it logs it in maillog.  What I have seen the first time through 
when it pushes values into the envelope they are

F<sending email address>
A<dont know what these numbers are>
X1
L<local email address>

The second time through when it reads the lines looking for 
SpamAssassin it looks like it is

F<sending email address>
A<dont know what these numbers are>
X1
SpamAssassin
L<local email address>

I guess what all this blabbering means is I am looking for info on the 
message format.  What is each line supposed to look like?  How was 
SpamAssassin inserted before the L<email> value when it comes after the 
envelope loop.  And what ever you might think is relevant but that I 
don't know enough to ask about.

Part 2.
It's much shorter.
All my spam scores are 0.0
How can I make it score something so I know SpamAssassin is really 
working?

Hope this all makes sense.
Thanks
Ben