From: William R S. <wi...@so...> - 2001-06-01 14:35:52
|
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 03:21:30PM +0100, James Sutherland wrote: >On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Ferric wrote: > >> hi, >> >> was a decision regarding which protocol (TCP|UDP) was going to be >> used taken? if so, has the stack already been written? > >UDP, and not yet: still waiting for protocol definition... I'm very busy >for the next week or two, then hope to do make a start on some code then. Part IB exams, eh? ;-) I've got my Part IIs starting Tuesday ... cane ... May I ask the reasons behind using UDP rather than TCP? Surely we will end up reimplementing a number of the features offered by TCP such as automatic retransmission, data integrity, rearrangement of packets that arrive out-of-order, etcetera. Will _________________________________________________________________________ William R Sowerbutts (BtG) wi...@so... Coder / Guru / Nrrrd http://sowerbutts.com main(){char*s=">#=0> ^#X@#@^7=";int c=0,m;for(;c<15;c++)for (m=-1;m<7;putchar(m++/6&c%3/2?10:s[c]-31&1<<m?42:32));} |