Re: [Netcommon-developer] log4net Version=1.2.11.0

[<as...@sz...>]

Dear Daniel,

I misunderstand you first I thought that ServiceStack is part of Log4Net!
Oh, yes I can see in ServiceStack the ServiceStack.Interfaces.dll is  
the abstraction layer!

But because I use Quartz.Net which is based on Common.Logging I would  
like to use that in my project.

Possible in my future project I will try ServiceStack.

Thanks your adjustment,
Attila.

Idézet ("Harman, Daniel A" <dan...@jp...>):

> What do you mean it's placed into one dll? Are they are merging  
> assemblies or something?
>
> For others reference, the project is here:  
> https://github.com/ServiceStack/ServiceStack.Logging
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> Daniel A Harman | VP | Delta1/PT RAD | J.P. Morgan | 10  
> Aldermanbury, London, EC2V 7RF | T: +44 (0) 207 742 6565 | F: +44  
> (0)207 325 3722 | dan...@jp... | jpmorgan.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: as...@sz... [mailto:as...@sz...]
> Sent: 12 January 2012 07:24
> To: net...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Netcommon-developer] log4net Version=1.2.11.0
>
> Hi,
>
>> It's worth noting that servicestack now have a similar logging
>> abstraction component. Not tried it yet, but may be worth
>> consideration.
>
> Because Log4Net is placed into one DLL I can not see that abstarction
> layer as Common.Logging.dll.
>
> Attila.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> RSA(R) Conference 2012
> Mar 27 - Feb 2
> Save $400 by Jan. 27
> Register now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev2
> _______________________________________________
> Netcommon-developer mailing list
> Net...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netcommon-developer
> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
>