Re: [Netcommon-developer] Runtime error with custom LoggerFactoryAdapter/Logger

[Geoghegan, W. A (Willie) <wil...@in...>]

Thanks, that fixed it.  I had not used that particular syntax ( :this( … ) ) before and I did not follow your suggestion correctly.

 

I ended up with something like this:

 

MyAdapter : AbstractCachingLoggerFactoryAdapter

{

  public MyAdapter(NameValueCollection properties)

  {

    //No code here because I don’t need any config params right now

  }

 

  public MyAdapter()

    : this(new NameValueCollection())

  {

    //Parameterless constructor so I don’t have to put a dummy param in the app.config file

  }

}

 

Thanks again.

 

 

From: ken...@gm... [mailto:ken...@gm...] On Behalf Of Kenneth Xu
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 10:16 AM
To: Geoghegan, William A (Willie)
Subject: Re: [Netcommon-developer] Runtime error with custom LoggerFactoryAdapter/Logger

 

This is because you didn't derive the the correct constructor. That's way I ask you to use ': this( new NameValueCollection()){}' in my previous email.

On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Geoghegan, William A (Willie) <wil...@in...> wrote:

If I try to add a parameterless constructor, it won’t compile because Common.Logging.Factory.AbstractCachingLoggerFactoryAdapter (from which I derived my adapter) does not contain a constructor that takes 0 arguments.