Re: [Netcommon-developer] Common.Logging - EntLib

[Peter A. K. <pk...@al...>]

Thanks - I have tried to rebuild the sources, and have successfully generated the new Entlib41 assembly. So I can get this to work fine in my application - except in an application which uses Spring.net, because it is apparently built against common.logging version 1.2.0, which means it fails against the new dll I have built...



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erich Eichinger [mailto:Eri...@sp...] 
> Sent: 14. januar 2009 12:44
> To: Peter A. Kirk; net...@li...
> Subject: RE: Common.Logging - EntLib
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> If you're not afraid of compiling the sources yourself, you 
> find already everything in the trunk. Just check out the 
> resolved issues to see, what has happened since 1.2. 
> Not sure when we're going to make the next official release, 
> because there are some unsolved discussions about the 
> extended design of the ILog interface. If you want to take a 
> look into it, I'd be happy to receive your (and everybody 
> else's) feedback!
> 
> cheers,
> Erich
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter A. Kirk [mailto:pk...@al...] 
> Sent: Mittwoch, 14. Jänner 2009 11:34
> To: net...@li...
> Subject: [Netcommon-developer] Common.Logging - EntLib
> 
> Hi
> 
> I was really happy to discover "common logging", as our customers
> normally use either Log4Net or Enterprise Library Logging - 
> so it would
> be great to simply be able to select this via configuration.
> 
> I was wondering though if "common logging" will be updated to 
> use EntLib
> 4.1? The current release is for 3.1.
> 
> Thanks,
> Peter
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> Netcommon-developer mailing list
> Net...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netcommon-developer
>