From: Andre S. <A.S...@aa...> - 2002-09-30 13:29:17
|
>>> Simon Bazley <simon=40eyeeye.com> 30.09.2002 15:21:19 >>> ... >Don=27t miss the fact thought, that the whole reasone why Joe=20 >did CNID in the first place was because none of the other systems=20 >were 100% reliable. I used did=3Dlast in an office of 20 designers=20 >and journalists for six months and I didn=27t have major >disasters. Every problem we encountered had a work around. > The Designers kept local copies of anything massive, and the=20 >Journalists checked things had saved OK before closing any work.=20 > Aliases were never used. It wasn=27t ideal but it worked. The problem is mainly with application who use aliases for links to embedded documents/pictures etc. Like Adobe Indesign. And it seems to greatly depend on the undelying filesystem. We did never dot anything working with any DID scheme other=20 than CNID and ReiserFS and Indesign. At every restart of the AFPD all links inside the Indesign documents got lost or (even worse) pointed to the wrong documents/pictures. Andr=E9 aarboard ag internet - networks - screen&print design - multimedia Egliweg 10 - Postfach 214 - CH-2560 Nidau (Switzerland) Phone +41 32 332 9714 - Fax +41 32 332 9715 www.aarboard.ch - a.schild=40aarboard.ch |