Re: [Netatalk-admins] Video Editing

[P.V.Anthony <an...@mi...>]

Shlomi Yaakobovich wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Our product (ExaStore) uses both NFS and AFP, and we use netatalk to work with Mac clients, although NFS is faster. At least for us, netatalk is good enough, but we are using good hardware and lots of memory... As a matter of fact, we showed just that on the IBC show a week ago, compressed HDTV on AFP (netatalk) and uncompressed on NFS (since it is much faster). So if you can settle for compressed content, netatalk should be good enough.
> 
> Shlomi

Thanks to both of you for answering. It is useful information.

How did you solve the problem of resource forks in NFS with Mac files?

P.V.Anthony