netadm-devel

[Netadm-devel] kwan-kyung readme please ~

[jeho-park <lin...@gm...>]

hi  kwan-kyung

i remember that you hope to develop virus checking module in gwc.

about a few months later,  i will schedule to check in my  L4 proxy 
daemon source to our cvs, if you don't.
this proxy may be just a general port proxy(just only relay proxy). and 
than i will expend its properity to the specified port proxy daemon.
for example, HTTP and FTP
if you want to make proxy daemon by yourself,  i don't hesitate to throw 
away my proxy source.
but if your proxy daemon come from other open source, i dont want to use 
it instead of my self made daemon.
i want your reply about this idea!

todays, i am analyzing  and porting dansguard (content filtering module) 
of HTTP proxy daemon for money ^-^;
and  it is almost finished to make it to c library of contents filtering 
module. (supporting PICS, site rating)
in this year, i will check in this content filtering library to our gwc, 
i want you to develop and check in your virus checking module to our 
HTTP proxy. how about this suggestion ?  if possible,  i  also want  you 
to develop web proxy as i described above.


i will try to make our project more active and more profitable or money 
making.
so i need more help.  bye ~

regards
jeho park.

Re: [Netadm-devel] kwan-kyung readme please ~

[jeho-park <lin...@gm...>]

hi il-eok


il-eok hwang wrote:

>  
> hi.. jeho-park.
>  
> Oh, Did you make the HTTP Proxy?

.. about 4,5 years ago, i made or upgraded HTTP, TELNET proxy daemon for 
my company.
but it is almost same as relay-proxy.  (^^;  few functionality. -_-;  
(user auth/proxy policy auth, virus checking, url filtering that's all)  
i used virus checking engine of other company.


>   Last year, I also make the Harm site Filter supported
> the PICS operated in KERNEL.  I use netfilter target in developing that.
>  

good !. 
a few hours ago, i completed porting content filter part of dansguard ( 
http://dansguardian.org/) to my c library  in bsd-i386-release6.0 .   
but during testing this library, i found that some case of calling 
"regexec"  that process was killed by SIGFAULT SIG only in linux. 

hm.. it's so currious why did you implement content filtering of L4 to 
the L2  layer of netfilter frame. ?
is there any reason ? ..  for performance ?   but it seems so very 
interesting
i think netfilter is very interesting stuff ~,   and i  consider  L2  
layer  programmer is real  network programmer.
and other socket programmer is just application programmer. so you looks 
so excellent ~


> If you ok, I want to see the your source code.

i need some time to modify or delete some commercial code in it.  i  
want your understanding.

regards.
jeho-park.

>  
> Have a nice day~~~
>
>  
> 2006/3/18, jeho-park <lin...@gm... 
> <mailto:lin...@gm...>>:
>
>     hi  kwan-kyung
>
>     i remember that you hope to develop virus checking module in gwc.
>
>     about a few months later,  i will schedule to check in my  L4 proxy
>     daemon source to our cvs, if you don't.
>     this proxy may be just a general port proxy(just only relay
>     proxy). and
>     than i will expend its properity to the specified port proxy daemon.
>     for example, HTTP and FTP
>     if you want to make proxy daemon by yourself,  i don't hesitate to
>     throw
>     away my proxy source.
>     but if your proxy daemon come from other open source, i dont want
>     to use
>     it instead of my self made daemon.
>     i want your reply about this idea!
>
>     todays, i am analyzing  and porting dansguard (content filtering
>     module)
>     of HTTP proxy daemon for money ^-^;
>     and  it is almost finished to make it to c library of contents
>     filtering
>     module. (supporting PICS, site rating)
>     in this year, i will check in this content filtering library to
>     our gwc,
>     i want you to develop and check in your virus checking module to our
>     HTTP proxy. how about this suggestion ?  if possible,  i  also
>     want  you
>     to develop web proxy as i described above.
>
>
>     i will try to make our project more active and more profitable or
>     money
>     making.
>     so i need more help.  bye ~
>
>     regards
>     jeho park.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>     -------------------------------------------------------
>     This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
>     language
>     that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the
>     live webcast
>     and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
>     territory!
>     http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
>     <http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Netadm-devel mailing list
>     Net...@li...
>     <mailto:Net...@li...>
>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netadm-devel
>     <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netadm-devel>
>
>

Re: [Netadm-devel] kwan-kyung readme please ~

[il-eok h. <ie...@gm...>]

hi, jeho-park.

jeho-park wrote:

 hm.. it's so currious why did you implement content filtering of L4 to the
> L2  layer of netfilter frame. ?
> is there any reason ? ..  for performance ?

*=3D=3D> As you guess, just for performance.*
*Last year, I had developed "HARM Site Filter" for minors in user land.*
*It use port re-direction. But too slow.  So I dicided to port to kernel.*
*To my satisfaction, it show me excellent performance*.


jeho-park wrote :

 i need some time to modify or delete some commercial code in it.  i  want
> your understanding

*=3D=3D> Sure. I really understand.*


Have a nice day ~~~~

2006/3/19, jeho-park <lin...@gm...>:
>
> hi il-eok
>
>
> il-eok hwang wrote:
>
>
> hi.. jeho-park.
>
> Oh, Did you make the HTTP Proxy?
>
> .. about 4,5 years ago, i made or upgraded HTTP, TELNET proxy daemon for
> my company.
> but it is almost same as relay-proxy.  (^^;  few functionality. -_-;
> (user auth/proxy policy auth, virus checking, url filtering that's all)  =
i
> used virus checking engine of other company.
>
>
>    Last year, I also make the Harm site Filter supported
> the PICS operated in KERNEL.  I use netfilter target in developing that.
>
>
> good !.
> a few hours ago, i completed porting content filter part of dansguard (
> http://dansguardian.org/) to my c library  in bsd-i386-release6.0 .   but
> during testing this library, i found that some case of calling "regexec"
> that process was killed by SIGFAULT SIG only in linux.
>
> hm.. it's so currious why did you implement content filtering of L4 to th=
e
> L2  layer of netfilter frame. ?
> is there any reason ? ..  for performance ?   but it seems so very
> interesting
> i think netfilter is very interesting stuff ~,   and i  consider  L2
> layer  programmer is real  network programmer.
> and other socket programmer is just application programmer. so you looks
> so excellent ~
>
>
>  If you ok, I want to see the your source code.
>
>
> i need some time to modify or delete some commercial code in it.  i  want
> your understanding.
>
> regards.
> jeho-park.
>
>
> Have a nice day~~~
>
>
> 2006/3/18, jeho-park <lin...@gm...>:
> >
> > hi  kwan-kyung
> >
> > i remember that you hope to develop virus checking module in gwc.
> >
> > about a few months later,  i will schedule to check in my  L4 proxy
> > daemon source to our cvs, if you don't.
> > this proxy may be just a general port proxy(just only relay proxy). and
> > than i will expend its properity to the specified port proxy daemon.
> > for example, HTTP and FTP
> > if you want to make proxy daemon by yourself,  i don't hesitate to thro=
w
> > away my proxy source.
> > but if your proxy daemon come from other open source, i dont want to us=
e
> > it instead of my self made daemon.
> > i want your reply about this idea!
> >
> > todays, i am analyzing  and porting dansguard (content filtering module=
)
> > of HTTP proxy daemon for money ^-^;
> > and  it is almost finished to make it to c library of contents filterin=
g
> > module. (supporting PICS, site rating)
> > in this year, i will check in this content filtering library to our gwc=
,
> > i want you to develop and check in your virus checking module to our
> > HTTP proxy. how about this suggestion ?  if possible,  i  also want  yo=
u
> >
> > to develop web proxy as i described above.
> >
> >
> > i will try to make our project more active and more profitable or money
> > making.
> > so i need more help.  bye ~
> >
> > regards
> > jeho park.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting
> > language
> > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live
> > webcast
> > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding
> > territory!
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=
=3D121642
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Netadm-devel mailing list
> > Net...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/netadm-devel
> >
>
>
>