Re: [Netadm-devel] il-eok suggested IPS frame

[il-eok h. <ie...@gm...>]

hi jeho-park.

jeho-park wrote:
i understand what you say, i just hope that gwc operate without
installation of other external program as possible as it can.
*=3D=3D> I got it what you want.  I will consider the connection GWC and IP=
S and
rewrite the PPT.*


jeho-park wrote:
if your frame asolutely depends on DBM, i think we must provide installatio=
n
option to our user.  for example,  the option of "use IPS" or  "no use IPS"
during installation.
i hope gwc to be small as possible as it can be
*=3D=3D> Oh.. it's a very nice idea.  After considering, if we will have to=
 use
DBM, we do that as you said.  **Thanks.*

Have a nice day~~~

2006/3/18, jeho-park <lin...@gm...>:
>
> hi il-eok
>
>
> il-eok hwang wrote:
>
> hi.. everyone.
>
> jeho-park wrote:
> 1. if possible, i don't want any specfied DB engine in gwc,
>       because  i hope gwc operate with no dependency with other  specfied
>     DB engine .  so  i  think  it is possible to use encrypted file to
> store session infomation instead of using other DB engine.
>     i want to know how il-eok think about this point.
> *=3D=3D> As i think, encrypted file is a kind of "flat DB". As you know, =
we
> need a DB in managing *
> *       the detection log.  Anyway, we have to write the detection log.*
>
> i understand what you say, i just hope that gwc operate without
> installation of other external program as possible as it can.  if your fr=
ame
> asolutely depends on DBM, i think we must provide installation option to =
our
> user.  for example,  the option of "use IPS" or  "no use IPS"  during
> installation.
> i hope gwc to be small as possible as it can be.
>
>
> jeho-park wrote:
>     and in the figure,  does "DB wrapper", "Web wrapper" modules export
> abstract interface function to external DB or web server ?   i want to kn=
ow
> more about this wrapper.   if so, it seems good~
> *=3D=3D> Yes. But sorry, give me a time to ready about those.*
>
>
> yes. i will wait with pleasure.  i think that's good idea.
>
> jeho-park wrote:
> 2. in the figure of the file above, cli module interfaces with admd.
>     what infomation is shared in both admd and cli ?
> *=3D=3D> some options.
>
> *
>
>
> regards
>
> jeho park
>
> Have a nice day~~
>
>
> 2006/3/15, jeho-park <lin...@gm...>:
> >
> >
> > hi netadm members
> >
> > todays, i received a  file from il-eok. in that file, il-eok suggested
> > IPS system which operate with gwc.
> >
> > directory : http://jhpark.guideline.co.kr/data/PROJECT/netadm/gwc/doc/g=
wc-ips-frame-suggestion.pdf
> >
> > *gwc-ips-frame-suggestion.pdf<http://jhpark.guideline.co.kr/data/PROJEC=
T/netadm/gwc/doc/gwc-ips-frame-suggestion.pdf>
> >
> > *
> > i have a few questions to il-eok about his IPS frame.
> >
> > 1. if possible, i don't want any specfied DB engine in gwc,
> >       because  i hope gwc operate with no dependency with other
> > specfied
> >     DB engine .  so  i  think  it is possible to use encrypted file to
> > store session infomation instead of using other DB engine.
> >     i want to know how il-eok think about this point.
> >
> >     and in the figure,  does "DB wrapper", "Web wrapper" modules export
> > abstract interface function to external DB or web server ?   i want to =
know
> > more about this wrapper.   if so, it seems good~
> > *
> > *2. in the figure of the file above, cli module interfaces with admd.
> >     what infomation is shared in both admd and cli ?
> > *
> >
> > *
>
>
>
>