Re: recent range checking additions...

[<ni...@ba...>]

On 16 Nov 2000 18:00:41 -0800 Wes Hardaker <wjh...@uc...> wrote:
>
>Niels, somehow this isn't correct:
>
>  % ../apps/snmpset localhost ucdavis.254.8.0 i 4
>  ucdavis.254.8.0: Bad value notation (Type of object is not INTEGER) 
>
>It shouldn't know what the type of that node is, since its in the
>unregistered mib tree area...

I thought I had taken care of what happened when you exit the tree, but
apparently not always. I will check into it.

>Wouldn't it also be nice if you mentioned what type it was expecting,
>rather than the type you specified?
>
>  5:58pm homestyle [291]: ../apps/snmpset localhost sysContact.0 i 4
>  sysContact.0: Bad value notation (Type of object is not
INTEGER)                
>Something like:
>
>  5:58pm homestyle [291]: ../apps/snmpset localhost sysContact.0 i 4
>  sysContact.0: Bad value notation (Type of object is OCTET STRING, not
INTEGER)          

Yes, I want it to do that too, but your threat about a pre2 made me do the
check-in, so that I could get some more testers.

I will see if I can fix it this evening.

/Niels

-- 
Get your firstname@lastname email for FREE at http://Nameplanet.com/?su