|
From: Syed A. <sy...@ne...> - 2003-02-24 19:13:30
|
I had set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and the LD_RUN_PATH to include the SSL libs before I ran configure. However, after reading your email I tried the following option with configure: --with-openssl=3D/usr/local/ssl Now I get a configure error saying:=20 checking for authentication support... Internal MD5 Support configure: error: Asked to use OpenSSL but I couldn't find it. I have installed OpenSSL 0.9.6g and when I do an ls on /usr/local/ssl I see: bash-2.03# ls /usr/local/ssl bin certs doc include lib man misc openssl.cnf private bash-2.03# ls /usr/local/ssl/lib libcrypto.a libcrypto.so.0 libssl.a libssl.so.0 libcrypto.so libcrypto.so.0.9.6 libssl.so libssl.so.0.9.6 bash-2.03#=20 -----Original Message----- From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:har...@us...]=20 Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 11:13 AM To: Syed Ali Cc: net...@li... Subject: Re: snmpwalk: Unsupported security level >>>>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:50:30 -0500, "Syed Ali" <sy...@ne...> said: Syed> I see that the agent replaces the createUser string in Syed> /var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf with an encrypted string. (Just a nit: it's not an encrypted string... It's a localized hash of the pass phrase you used. It's a "key" actually.) Syed> I get the below error message: Syed> snmpwalk: Unsupported security level When you compiled the sources, it couldn't find the OpenSSL package and thus you don't have DES support available and thus -l authPriv won't work. -l authNoPriv will, but you won't get encryption (but you will get secure authentication). Syed> Here are some things I have tried: Syed> snmpwalk -v 3 localhost -u root -x DES -X mypassword -a SHA -A Syed> mypassword-l noAuthNoPriv Syed> Error in packet. Syed> Reason: authorizationError (access denied to that object) Minimum accept security level: authNoPriv, and yours was "less" Syed> snmpwalk -v 3 localhost -u root -x DES -X mypassword -a SHA -A Syed> mypassword -l authNoPriv Syed> snmpwalk: Authentication failure (incorrect password, community or key) That, I think, should have worked assuming your passwords were the same. --=20 Wes Hardaker Network Associates Laboratories |