Menu
▾
▴
ndoc-users — Discussions about using NDoc
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(29) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(31) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 |
Jan
(28) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(7) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
|
From: Ken K. <jun...@ya...> - 2006-03-17 18:32:08
|
Why would you need additional tasks to build NDoc? Are you not using Visual Studio? If a batch build is desired, I believe Visual Studio can be used from the command line, using the same solution as when the IDE is opened. This was true back with VS 6.0, I haven't tried it since, but can't imagine MS would remove this functionality. --- Heath Stewart <clu...@ho...> wrote: > It's not clear if you mean you ported the solution > ans project files to "2005" format, you added > support to NDoc for generics, or both. Could you > please elaborate? > > Regarding the project formats, msbuild.exe that > ships with the 2.0 Framework can build these, so if > the group is intent on building with and requiring > the 2.0 runtime then I don't believe that will hurt > the community, but that is a big requirement for our > users. > > That said a coworker of mine has created MSBee, a > set of tasks to build on .NET 1.1 using msbuild.exe. > See http://blogs.msdn.com/clichten. > > Of course we could always switch to NAnt (if we > haven't already; it's been a while since I've had > time to look at the source). > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "ndo...@li..." > <ndo...@li...> on behalf > of "Paul Selormey" <pa...@to...> > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:48 AM > To: "Jeremiah Voris" <jer...@gm...> > Cc: "ndo...@li..." > <ndo...@li...>, > "ndo...@li..." > <ndo...@li...> > Subject: [ndoc-devel] Re: [Ndoc-users] Ndoc for 2005 > > Right, that is a very good idea. I am currently > planning to start a project in VS.NET 2005 and will > seriously need NDoc support. > > David Strickland, Ken Kohler also announced a > similar update > for the .NET 2 support. Please get together and > merge these > updates and upload it somewhere for us to test it, > and start > working with it. I believe the NDoc developers are > currently > busy, so for now a fork will not be bad. > > Best regards, > Paul. > > Jeremiah Voris wrote: > > On 3/16/06, Strickland,David > <dst...@mn...> wrote: > >> I have a buildable 2005 copy based off of 1.3v13. > I spent the better part of > >> the day today doing a simple port and reworking > the Solution and project > >> classes to support the new formats. Is there > another project everyone has > >> moved to already if not anyone got a suggestion > where I can post this thing > >> so we can start testing/hacking on it. Granted > it's got more bugs then a new > >> york slum and is probably about as Stable a > democracy in Iraq but if no one > >> else has anything it'll be a place to start. If > needed we could always > >> branch into a new SourceForge Project but that > might be overkill and in the > >> end do more harm to the community then good. > >> > >> Anyone care to comment? > > > > Sounds like you and Ken Kohler need to get > together and figure out an > > integration strategy. :) Has anyone contacted the > project admins? > > > > -- > > 533777336444244 > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a > groundbreaking scripting language > > that extends applications into web and mobile > media. Attend the live webcast > > and join the prime developer group breaking into > this new coding territory! > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Ndoc-users mailing list > > Ndo...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a > groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. > Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into > this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > ndoc-devel mailing list > ndo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a > groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. > Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into > this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > Ndoc-users mailing list > Ndo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Heath S. <clu...@ho...> - 2006-03-17 15:36:34
|
It's not clear if you mean you ported the solution ans project files to = "2005" format, you added support to NDoc for generics, or both. Could = you please elaborate? Regarding the project formats, msbuild.exe that ships with the 2.0 = Framework can build these, so if the group is intent on building with = and requiring the 2.0 runtime then I don't believe that will hurt the = community, but that is a big requirement for our users. That said a coworker of mine has created MSBee, a set of tasks to build = on .NET 1.1 using msbuild.exe. See http://blogs.msdn.com/clichten. Of course we could always switch to NAnt (if we haven't already; it's = been a while since I've had time to look at the source). -----Original Message----- From: "ndo...@li..." = <ndo...@li...> on behalf of "Paul Selormey" = <pa...@to...> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:48 AM To: "Jeremiah Voris" <jer...@gm...> Cc: "ndo...@li..." = <ndo...@li...>, "ndo...@li..." = <ndo...@li...> Subject: [ndoc-devel] Re: [Ndoc-users] Ndoc for 2005 Right, that is a very good idea. I am currently planning to start a project in VS.NET 2005 and will seriously need NDoc support. David Strickland, Ken Kohler also announced a similar update for the .NET 2 support. Please get together and merge these updates and upload it somewhere for us to test it, and start working with it. I believe the NDoc developers are currently busy, so for now a fork will not be bad. Best regards, Paul. Jeremiah Voris wrote: > On 3/16/06, Strickland,David <dst...@mn...> wrote: >> I have a buildable 2005 copy based off of 1.3v13. I spent the better = part of >> the day today doing a simple port and reworking the Solution and = project >> classes to support the new formats. Is there another project everyone = has >> moved to already if not anyone got a suggestion where I can post this = thing >> so we can start testing/hacking on it. Granted it's got more bugs = then a new >> york slum and is probably about as Stable a democracy in Iraq but if = no one >> else has anything it'll be a place to start. If needed we could = always >> branch into a new SourceForge Project but that might be overkill and = in the >> end do more harm to the community then good. >> >> Anyone care to comment? >=20 > Sounds like you and Ken Kohler need to get together and figure out an > integration strategy. :) Has anyone contacted the project admins? >=20 > -- > 533777336444244 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting = language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live = webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding = territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Ndoc-users mailing list > Ndo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting = language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live = webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding = territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ ndoc-devel mailing list ndo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-devel |
|
From: Derrick, S. <Sal...@su...> - 2006-03-17 13:11:06
|
It might be too late to avoid that. Kevin sent alpha code in Jan that worked fine for my purposes. Here's the email I received:=20 > >Hi everyone, > >Make sure you look at the "read-me" file ! =20 > >Current Build is >http://members.optushome.com.au/kdowns/NDoc2-Alpha3k-20060120.zip > > >Let me know how you get on; bug reports, comments and suggestions are always welcome :-) > > >regards, >Kevin =20 > Sally -----Original Message----- From: ndo...@li... [mailto:ndo...@li...] On Behalf Of David Kean Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 10:17 PM To: Paul Selormey; Jeremiah Voris Cc: ndo...@li...; ndo...@li... Subject: RE: [Ndoc-users] Ndoc for 2005 You might want to ping Kevin Downs (kdowns AT optusnet DOT com DOT au), as he is currently working up an update for 2.0 and you probably don't want to be duplicating effort. -----Original Message----- From: ndo...@li... [mailto:ndo...@li...] On Behalf Of Paul Selormey Sent: Thursday, 16 March 2006 7:49 PM To: Jeremiah Voris Cc: ndo...@li...; ndo...@li... Subject: Re: [Ndoc-users] Ndoc for 2005 Right, that is a very good idea. I am currently planning to start a project in VS.NET 2005 and will seriously need NDoc support. David Strickland, Ken Kohler also announced a similar update for the .NET 2 support. Please get together and merge these updates and upload it somewhere for us to test it, and start working with it. I believe the NDoc developers are currently busy, so for now a fork will not be bad. Best regards, Paul. Jeremiah Voris wrote: > On 3/16/06, Strickland,David <dst...@mn...> wrote: >> I have a buildable 2005 copy based off of 1.3v13. I spent the better part of >> the day today doing a simple port and reworking the Solution and project >> classes to support the new formats. Is there another project everyone has >> moved to already if not anyone got a suggestion where I can post this thing >> so we can start testing/hacking on it. Granted it's got more bugs then a new >> york slum and is probably about as Stable a democracy in Iraq but if no one >> else has anything it'll be a place to start. If needed we could always >> branch into a new SourceForge Project but that might be overkill and in the >> end do more harm to the community then good. >> >> Anyone care to comment? >=20 > Sounds like you and Ken Kohler need to get together and figure out an=20 > integration strategy. :) Has anyone contacted the project admins? >=20 > -- > 533777336444244 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Ndoc-users mailing list > Ndo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Ndoc-users mailing list Ndo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users ######################################################################## ############# Attention: The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of AusSoft Solutions Pty Ltd. If you received this in error, please inform us by email at pos...@au... and delete the material from any system. ######################################################################## ############# ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Ndoc-users mailing list Ndo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users |
|
From: David K. <Dav...@au...> - 2006-03-17 04:17:10
|
You might want to ping Kevin Downs (kdowns AT optusnet DOT com DOT au), as he is currently working up an update for 2.0 and you probably don't want to be duplicating effort. -----Original Message----- From: ndo...@li... [mailto:ndo...@li...] On Behalf Of Paul Selormey Sent: Thursday, 16 March 2006 7:49 PM To: Jeremiah Voris Cc: ndo...@li...; ndo...@li... Subject: Re: [Ndoc-users] Ndoc for 2005 Right, that is a very good idea. I am currently planning to start a project in VS.NET 2005 and will seriously need NDoc support. David Strickland, Ken Kohler also announced a similar update for the .NET 2 support. Please get together and merge these updates and upload it somewhere for us to test it, and start working with it. I believe the NDoc developers are currently busy, so for now a fork will not be bad. Best regards, Paul. Jeremiah Voris wrote: > On 3/16/06, Strickland,David <dst...@mn...> wrote: >> I have a buildable 2005 copy based off of 1.3v13. I spent the better part of >> the day today doing a simple port and reworking the Solution and project >> classes to support the new formats. Is there another project everyone has >> moved to already if not anyone got a suggestion where I can post this thing >> so we can start testing/hacking on it. Granted it's got more bugs then a new >> york slum and is probably about as Stable a democracy in Iraq but if no one >> else has anything it'll be a place to start. If needed we could always >> branch into a new SourceForge Project but that might be overkill and in the >> end do more harm to the community then good. >> >> Anyone care to comment? >=20 > Sounds like you and Ken Kohler need to get together and figure out an > integration strategy. :) Has anyone contacted the project admins? >=20 > -- > 533777336444244 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Ndoc-users mailing list > Ndo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Ndoc-users mailing list Ndo...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users #########################################################################= ############ Attention: The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient= is prohibited. Any views expressed in this message are those of the indiv= idual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of AusSoft Solutions Pty= =20Ltd. If you received this in error, please inform us by email at postmaster@au= ssoft.com and delete the material from any system. #########################################################################= ############ |
|
From: Paul S. <pa...@to...> - 2006-03-17 03:49:47
|
Right, that is a very good idea. I am currently planning to start a project in VS.NET 2005 and will seriously need NDoc support. David Strickland, Ken Kohler also announced a similar update for the .NET 2 support. Please get together and merge these updates and upload it somewhere for us to test it, and start working with it. I believe the NDoc developers are currently busy, so for now a fork will not be bad. Best regards, Paul. Jeremiah Voris wrote: > On 3/16/06, Strickland,David <dst...@mn...> wrote: >> I have a buildable 2005 copy based off of 1.3v13. I spent the better part of >> the day today doing a simple port and reworking the Solution and project >> classes to support the new formats. Is there another project everyone has >> moved to already if not anyone got a suggestion where I can post this thing >> so we can start testing/hacking on it. Granted it's got more bugs then a new >> york slum and is probably about as Stable a democracy in Iraq but if no one >> else has anything it'll be a place to start. If needed we could always >> branch into a new SourceForge Project but that might be overkill and in the >> end do more harm to the community then good. >> >> Anyone care to comment? > > Sounds like you and Ken Kohler need to get together and figure out an > integration strategy. :) Has anyone contacted the project admins? > > -- > 533777336444244 > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > Ndoc-users mailing list > Ndo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-users |
|
From: Jeremiah V. <jer...@gm...> - 2006-03-16 23:39:11
|
On 3/16/06, Strickland,David <dst...@mn...> wrote: > I have a buildable 2005 copy based off of 1.3v13. I spent the better part= of > the day today doing a simple port and reworking the Solution and project > classes to support the new formats. Is there another project everyone has > moved to already if not anyone got a suggestion where I can post this thi= ng > so we can start testing/hacking on it. Granted it's got more bugs then a = new > york slum and is probably about as Stable a democracy in Iraq but if no o= ne > else has anything it'll be a place to start. If needed we could always > branch into a new SourceForge Project but that might be overkill and in t= he > end do more harm to the community then good. > > Anyone care to comment? Sounds like you and Ken Kohler need to get together and figure out an integration strategy. :) Has anyone contacted the project admins? -- 533777336444244 |
|
From: Strickland,David <dst...@mn...> - 2006-03-16 22:06:27
|
I have a buildable 2005 copy based off of 1.3v13. I spent the better part of the day today doing a simple port and reworking the Solution and project classes to support the new formats. Is there another project everyone has moved to already if not anyone got a suggestion where I can post this thing so we can start testing/hacking on it. Granted it's got more bugs then a new york slum and is probably about as Stable a democracy in Iraq but if no one else has anything it'll be a place to start. If needed we could always branch into a new SourceForge Project but that might be overkill and in the end do more harm to the community then good. Anyone care to comment? The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. |
|
From: Ken K. <jun...@ya...> - 2006-03-13 18:47:48
|
Hi, I have successfully updated NDoc (MSDN and MSDN2 Documentors) to work with .Net 2.0, Generics and correct the links to the CLR help. I started with 1.3.1 v13 from http://jonas.lagerblad.com/blog/?p=4 I need to know how to go about releasing the code to SourceForge. I haven't looked at the source control, but this should probably be a separate branch from 1.3.1. Ken __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
From: Jaroslaw K. <ja...@jk...> - 2006-03-10 16:28:03
|
Hi! I've developed a set of extensibility XSLT templates which require me to use XSLT document() function. Unfortunately current version of NDoc doesn't support it in MSDN documenter (and perhaps others, too), because it doesn't pass the correct resolver to the Transform function. I'm attaching a patch that makes it possible. Simple two-liner. Can someone please commit it and make sure it gets into further releases of NDoc? Regards, Jarek |
|
From: Michael S. <mic...@mb...> - 2006-03-10 14:52:16
|
If I remember correctly, I had to download the VS2005 SDK and install it. Go here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/extend/default.aspx and look for the October 2005 SDK. I don't know if the new March CTP has the VS Help Authoring/Integration stuff. Good luck. MS _____ From: ndo...@li... [mailto:ndo...@li...] On Behalf Of Frank Striegel Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 8:44 AM To: ndo...@li... Subject: [Ndoc-users] VSHIK2003.exe don't work with VS2005 Hello, <http://jonas.lagerblad.com/blog/?p=4> Jonas Lagerblad has compiled a NDoc version against .Net 2.0. But for running NDoc a Help Compiler is needed. But I can't install VSHIK2003.exe with VS2005 and VSHIK2005.exe I can't find. What can I do? Regards Frank |
|
From: Frank S. <f.s...@ea...> - 2006-03-10 14:43:55
|
Hello, =20 Jonas Lagerblad <http://jonas.lagerblad.com/blog/?p=3D4> has compiled a NDoc version against .Net 2.0. But for running NDoc a Help Compiler is needed. But I can't install VSHIK2003.exe with VS2005 and VSHIK2005.exe I can't find. What can I do? =20 Regards Frank |
|
From: Atsushi E. <at...@xi...> - 2006-02-25 05:24:18
|
Hi there, (I once sent this message to ex-contributor, turned out it was quite a while ago, so I'm resending it here this time.) I heard from some Japanese guys that there is a fork project for NDoc (NDoc-ja). http://sourceforge.jp/projects/ndoc-jp/ Looks like the purpose of that project not localization but globalization. I was curious, so I asked people why they needed Japanese version since extra fork does not sound good. Then someone told me that NDoc MSDN2Documenter never works fine because of   ( ) which does not have a corresponding character in Shift_JIS encoding (it escaped   into 0x3F'?'). So, current ndoc approach does not look fine. That ndoc-ja version has such a hack in Msdn2Documenter.cs like: private void TransformAndWriteResult( string transformName, XsltArgumentList arguments, string filename) { <snip> using (streamWriter = new StreamWriter( File.Open(Path.Combine(workspace.WorkingDirectory, filename), FileMode.Create), currentFileEncoding)) { // // Cannot convert   to Shift_JIS code!!!! // string html = stringWriter.ToString().Replace("\xA0", " "); streamWriter.Write(html); } This problem could be solved by - avoiding that character (I dunno why it is used;   would be fine), or - using UTF-8 (dunno if it is OK for MS help format), or - writing custom output-escaping XmlWriter. I'm not familiar with the .chm requirements, so I don't know which will work or not. If first two approaches does not sound fine, I'll hack such XmlWriter for it, so let me know (I'm not a fan of this approach because it just avoids the real problem and also not perfect for performance) but such change would be minimum for current code basis). Atsushi Eno |
|
From: Atul M. <atu...@sc...> - 2006-02-24 14:18:49
|
Hi, In my code i am using assemblies of ESRI. While doing XML commenting for our code i am mentioning ESRI interaces in <seealso> tag but while generating its .chm file using NDOC tool i am not able to reference these interfaces. Please see the code comments below: - /// <summary> /// Indicates whether the bin grid is counter clockwise oriented or not. /// <seealso cref="ESRI.ArcObjects.Core.ICircularArc"/> /// <seealso cref="System.Object"/> /// </summary> Here i am able to reference System.Object as it is part of Microsoft Framework but i am not able to reference ESRI.ArcObjects.Core.ICircularArc. One more thing i like to mention is that i only have DLLs of ESRI and not the XML files. Please suggest that how can i achieve this usig NDOC tool. Thanks, Atul |
|
From: <man...@mi...> - 2006-02-23 12:19:23
|
Hi, =20 I've seen people asking for version 2 support and someone seems to be = working on it (Marc?). Someone is referring to version "1.3.1 v13" but I = can't find it anywhere. Can someone give us an hint what the status is, = where I can find the latest downloadables and - most importantly - if = you need help testing it. =20 We have a deadline coming up and we need to decide whether to use nDoc = or move to something else. =20 Thanks, Mans |
|
From: Simon D. <sim...@gm...> - 2006-02-21 07:50:19
|
if so, I'd like to help /Simon |
|
From: Steve B. <Ste...@sy...> - 2006-02-15 22:52:16
|
Hello,=0D =0D With NDOC v2, is there a way to exclude an entire namespace (fully or partial qualified) from documentation generation? =0D Thanks. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Notice: This e-mail message, together with any attachments, contains information of Symyx Technologies, Inc. or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted, privileged and/or protected work product, and is meant solely for the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately, permanently delete the original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto. |
|
From: Michael W. <mw...@hg...> - 2006-02-05 16:29:45
|
No, I'm not using the Express Edition. Visual Studio for Software
Developers. The /doc option works with csc.exe, I was just getting
compiler errors if I referenced a web service and the .xml file wasn't
being generated in this case.
=20
However, I found out how to generate a .dll for my web service using
wsdl.exe. So now I am able to reference the .dll with the /r option and
successfully get an .xml file. I still get an error message about the
absence of a "Main" procedure, but the .xml file is still produced.
=20
I think Microsoft needs to clarify their nomenclature in their
documentation. The File menu in Visual Studio has "New Project" and
"New Website", but the documentation on XML comments doesn't mention
this distinction.
________________________________
From: Elly Govers / Gerard van de Ven [mailto:ell...@xt...]=20
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 4:14 PM
To: Michael Wasson; ndo...@li...
Subject: RE: [Ndoc-users] Generating .XML file for ASP projects
Hi Michael,
=20
Are you using "Visual Web Developer Express Edition"? I am getting the
feeling that XML documentation generation is not supported in the
express edition. The documentation on the compilers still talks about
the "/doc" or "/doc:<filename>" option. But it is indeed nowhere to be
found in the project ("website") settings. If it also does not work from
the command line, then all I can think of is that it has been taken out.
=20
Maybe somebody else can shed some light on this?
=20
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: ndo...@li...
[mailto:ndo...@li...] Namens Michael Wasson
Verzonden: Saturday, 4 February 2006 4:39 a.m.
Aan: ndo...@li...
Onderwerp: [Ndoc-users] Generating .XML file for ASP projects
I would like to use the "XML Documentation Comments" feature of
VS 2005=20
described here:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b2s063f7.aspx
<http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b2s063f7.aspx> =20
=09
However, "websites" (as opposed to projects) don't have the "XML
Documentation File" checkbox on the Build property page. We have
tried=20
using csc.exe with the /doc option, but we have run across
problems if=20
the .cs file references external libraries or web services.=20
=09
Does anyone know how to strip XML comments out of an ASP 2.0
website?
|
|
From: Elly G. / G. v. de V. <ell...@xt...> - 2006-02-04 21:14:34
|
Hi Michael,
Are you using "Visual Web Developer Express Edition"? I am getting the
feeling that XML documentation generation is not supported in the express
edition. The documentation on the compilers still talks about the "/doc" or
"/doc:<filename>" option. But it is indeed nowhere to be found in the
project ("website") settings. If it also does not work from the command
line, then all I can think of is that it has been taken out.
Maybe somebody else can shed some light on this?
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: ndo...@li...
[mailto:ndo...@li...] Namens Michael Wasson
Verzonden: Saturday, 4 February 2006 4:39 a.m.
Aan: ndo...@li...
Onderwerp: [Ndoc-users] Generating .XML file for ASP projects
I would like to use the "XML Documentation Comments" feature of VS 2005
described here: <http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b2s063f7.aspx>
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b2s063f7.aspx
However, "websites" (as opposed to projects) don't have the "XML
Documentation File" checkbox on the Build property page. We have tried
using csc.exe with the /doc option, but we have run across problems if
the .cs file references external libraries or web services.
Does anyone know how to strip XML comments out of an ASP 2.0 website?
|
|
From: Michael W. <mw...@hg...> - 2006-02-03 15:39:35
|
I would like to use the "XML Documentation Comments" feature of VS 2005=20 described here: http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b2s063f7.aspx <http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/b2s063f7.aspx> =20 However, "websites" (as opposed to projects) don't have the "XML=20 Documentation File" checkbox on the Build property page. We have tried=20 using csc.exe with the /doc option, but we have run across problems if=20 the .cs file references external libraries or web services.=20 Does anyone know how to strip XML comments out of an ASP 2.0 website? |
|
From: Mark I. <mi...@so...> - 2006-02-03 15:07:29
|
Hi, when is the next version of ndoc going to come out? Really looking forward to the next release, for .NET 1.1 code it really is a thousand times better than doxygen. Thanks |
|
From: John-Paul Kloosterman-v. d. A. <jp....@gm...> - 2006-02-03 10:28:34
|
Hello, I get for the past two days the following error: "Could not get visitors lock: Check whether the web server can create the directory /tmp/persistent/ndoc/wiki/temp and whether it can create files in it." while trying to access the ndoc wiki. Does anyone who can be contacted to fix this? Greetings, John. |
|
From: Tim M. <ti...@tl...> - 2006-01-28 23:43:02
|
Just to make sure i'm on the same page, Which download is v13 that supports 2.0 code? Is this the one listed that "sort of" supports 2.0 code, or is this something better that i somehow missed the release of recently? Just curious. Thanks! -Tim _____ From: ndo...@li... [mailto:ndo...@li...] On Behalf Of Harry Douglass Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 12:26 PM To: ndo...@li... Subject: [Ndoc-users] .NET Framework Libraries not documenting with NDoc Hello, I downloaded the latest release of NDoc 1.3.1-v13 that supports v2.0 code. I cannot, however, get the standard .NET Framework object libraries to document when outputting to MSDN format with NDoc, such as System.Object, System.String, etc. When I click on them in the help file, they are broken links. When I used the v1.1 and set the "UseNamespaceDocSummaries" property to true, this did work. Is there something else I need to do? Thanks in advance, Harry |
|
From: Bill S. <tec...@gm...> - 2006-01-28 18:45:50
|
I believe you want to use the VS.NET documenter for v.2 framework compatability. On 1/28/06, Harry Douglass <h.d...@ve...> wrote: > I downloaded the latest release of NDoc 1.3.1-v13 that supports v2.0 code= . > I cannot, however, get the standard .NET Framework object libraries to > document when outputting to MSDN format with NDoc, such as System.Object, > System.String, etc. When I click on them in the help file, they are brok= en > links. When I used the v1.1 and set the "UseNamespaceDocSummaries" prope= rty > to true, this did work. -- Bill Swallow HATT List Owner WWP-Users List Owner 42.8162,-73.7736 http://techcommdood.blogspot.com =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D I support Char James-Tanny for STC Secretary. |
|
From: Harry D. <h.d...@ve...> - 2006-01-28 17:26:38
|
Hello, I downloaded the latest release of NDoc 1.3.1-v13 that supports v2.0 code. I cannot, however, get the standard .NET Framework object libraries to document when outputting to MSDN format with NDoc, such as System.Object, System.String, etc. When I click on them in the help file, they are broken links. When I used the v1.1 and set the "UseNamespaceDocSummaries" property to true, this did work. Is there something else I need to do? Thanks in advance, Harry |
|
From: Mark I. <mi...@so...> - 2006-01-27 15:48:27
|
Hi, i want to create a <contact> tag, and have it display in a similar
fashion to the <seealso> tag, ie:
=20
Contacts:
=20
Bob | Fred | Sam
=20
or
=20
Contacts:
=20
Bob
=20
etc
=20
To achieve this, i want to be able to do the following in my projects:
=20
/// <summary></summary>
/// <contact href=3D"ab...@xy...">Bob</contact>
/// <contact href=3D"xy...@ab...">Fred</contact>
public void MyFunc()
{
}
=20
=20
=20
Can anyone give me any help / tips on how to do this? I've looked at the
common.xslt file, and tried all sorts of variants, but i just cant get
it to work.
=20
=20
=20
=20
Thanks
=20
Mark
|
33 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.