From: Paul S. <pa...@to...> - 2006-05-17 22:35:24
|
Have you contacted them directly? Best regards, Paul.=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: ndo...@li...=20 > [mailto:ndo...@li...] On Behalf Of=20 > Jason Diamond > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 3:52 AM > To: ndo...@li... > Subject: Re: [ndoc-devel] NDoc2 - CVS? >=20 > Has anybody heard anything from Donald Kackman or Kevin Downs=20 > recently? They took over as admins on the project after I=20 > stopeed working on it, but I haven't seen them in a while. >=20 > Since one of them removed me as project administrator, I=20 > can't really do much with the SourceForge site or CVS, but I=20 > can probably get SF support to fix that if I explain the situation. >=20 > If they don't appear sometime soon to let us know what their=20 > plans may be, we should do exactly as you suggest and just=20 > make take one of the existing builds and check it in and make=20 > a release. >=20 > Since the bulk of the original NDoc code was under the GPL, I=20 > assume that means any changes that have been made that they=20 > distribute must include source. But we should probably make=20 > sure this is known, or at least ask who wants to volunteer=20 > their branch to become the NDoc 2.0. >=20 > Do we have a definitive list of 2.0 builds that we can choose from? >=20 > I'll wait a few days to see if Don or Kevin appears. If not,=20 > I'll contact SF support and get them to give me admin access. >=20 > -- > Jason >=20 > On 5/17/06, Mark Ingram <mi...@so...> wrote: > > Because there isnt one single team working on 2.0, there=20 > are several=20 > > variations of it built by different groups. > > As far as im aware, the builds are so significatly=20 > different that it=20 > > would be impossible to merge all projects together and get 1 single=20 > > branch. > > > > Looks like 1 project will have to be declared the=20 > "official" branch at=20 > > some point. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ndo...@li... > > [mailto:ndo...@li...] On Behalf Of Karl=20 > > Waclawek > > Sent: 17 May 2006 16:23 > > To: ndo...@li... > > Subject: [ndoc-devel] NDoc2 - CVS? > > > > From googling the web I can see that several alpha=20 > releases of NDOC=20 > > 2.0 have been made so far, but none publicly. The source in CVS has=20 > > not been updated as well. > > > > Why all the secrecy? > > > > Karl > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,=20 > > security? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to=20 > make your job=20 > > easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on=20 > > Apache Geronimo > >=20 > = http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D120709&bid=3D263057&dat=3D= 1216 > > 42 _______________________________________________ > > ndoc-devel mailing list > > ndo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-devel > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web=20 > services, security? > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to=20 > make your job=20 > > easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on=20 > > Apache Geronimo > > = http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid=120709&bid&3057&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > ndoc-devel mailing list > > ndo...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-devel > > >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web=20 > services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make=20 > your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server=20 > v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=120709&bid&3057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > ndoc-devel mailing list > ndo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ndoc-devel >=20 |