RE: [ndoc-devel] (no subject)

[Kral F. <kra...@ho...>]

Adam,

Do you know the format of the MIF or MML document?  If you have a 
specification for that then you may want to convert the information that 
NDoc provides (extracted code comments and reflection of the type 
information) into the native Framemaker format.  If you are talking about 
relying on something in the middle like first targeting Javadoc, HTML, or La 
TeX then you'd need to make sure that those NDoc targets have code that is 
up to date.  It's really your choice and it's about reading the code of NDoc 
to see what would best fit what you are trying to do...

Kral

>From: Adam Robey <A....@md...>
>To: "NDoc Developers List (ndo...@li...)" 
><ndo...@li...>
>Subject: [ndoc-devel] (no subject)
>Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:08:50 -0700
>
>Hello again. I posted this query back in December (of last year), but no 
>one
>seemed to have any ideas then. So, I'm posting it one more time...
>
>I'm exploring ways of putting NDoc output into FrameMaker files. I've
>considered the following options thus far:
>*	Write my own documenter that creates MIF files (or MML files). I've
>been studying the Javadoc MIF doclet for insights on the best way to
>implement this. (I've written Javadoc doclets before, but I've never 
>written
>an NDoc documenter.)
>*	Use the LaTeX documenter to generate LaTeX files, and then convert
>the LaTeX files to MIF files (or MML files). However, I've only found one
>LaTeX-to-MIF converter thus far. It's for the Unix platform, we mainly use
>PCs.
>*	Use one of the HTML documenters to generate HTML files, and then
>convert the HTML files to MIF files (or MML files). There are several
>HTML-to-MIF converters out there.
>
>Has anyone tried any of these ideas? Does anyone have any other 
>suggestions?
>
>Thanks very much for any information.
>
>-Adam Robey
>