|
From: Benjamin G. <ben...@bt...> - 2001-12-04 08:53:36
|
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:56:33PM +0100, Bo Lorentsen wrote: > Now I have been watching this project for a few weeks now, and seen that > the development of the project is a little slow at the moment, to say it > at least. Many of the base ideas in nb++ are really good, and it really > is worth building upon, and its therfor a shame that the project does > not develop futher or faster. I agree! > Me and some of my collecs are planing to use the nb++, as some of the > work in here is quite good, and we like to make some clean up, and > addons. But because the original authors don't seem to have the time, we > like to know if it was ok if we continue the development (still as a > open source project, ofcause). > > We sould be able to contribute with code to stablize, and enhance the > nb++, as we like to use it as a common library for some inhouse code > development. Actually, I think the project needs a new maintainer. I clearly haven't got the time to be a good maintainer for it anymore. Would you like to be the official maintainer of nb++? I would still be available to answer questions about the code. Benjamin |