Thread: [Nasm-devel] SF tracker turned off

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

I've just turned off the SF tracker.
Please switch to bugzilla.nasm.us

	Cyrill

> I've just turned off the SF tracker.
> Please switch to bugzilla.nasm.us

Where did the SF feature requests go?

And how can one cite/reference old SF requests?

Can we please bring the SF stuff back, and put it
in read-only mode, rather than nuking it?

On 03/30/2012 10:09 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> 
> There were a few bugs modification _after_ we've moved to bugzilla
> but as far as I remember I tried to update the comments in bugzilla
> manually to sync between SF and our bugzilla. But it was pain-in-ass
> exercise, which mean I really don't wanna do it again ;)
> 
> What I can do -- I can re-check comments again tomorow and try to
> figure out which of thme remained unsync'ed, ok?
> 
> As by feature requests -- they need to be imported into our bugzilla
> (which I didn't managed yet).
> 

There is also "Support Requests" which is horribly ill-defined and
probably should be imported for completeness but not accept new tickets.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:13:02AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> There is also "Support Requests" which is horribly ill-defined and
> probably should be imported for completeness but not accept new tickets.
> 

Ah, ok.

	Cyrill

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:19:44AM -0700, anonymous coward wrote:
> > I've just turned off the SF tracker.
> > Please switch to bugzilla.nasm.us
> 
> Where did the SF feature requests go?
> 
> And how can one cite/reference old SF requests?
> 
> Can we please bring the SF stuff back, and put it
> in read-only mode, rather than nuking it?

The feature requests were not imported into bugzilla
(I suspect we simply missed it). I personally don't
know if there a way to turn SF tracker into r/o mode,
i'll try.

	Cyrill

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 10:23:40PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:19:44AM -0700, anonymous coward wrote:
> > > I've just turned off the SF tracker.
> > > Please switch to bugzilla.nasm.us
> > 
> > Where did the SF feature requests go?
> > 
> > And how can one cite/reference old SF requests?
> > 
> > Can we please bring the SF stuff back, and put it
> > in read-only mode, rather than nuking it?
> 
> The feature requests were not imported into bugzilla
> (I suspect we simply missed it). I personally don't
> know if there a way to turn SF tracker into r/o mode,
> i'll try.
> 

So they should be back now, but there is no ro mode,
so I fear people might continue posting bugs and feature
requests on SF :(

	Cyrill

>> > > I've just turned off the SF tracker.
>> > > Please switch to bugzilla.nasm.us
>> >
>> > Where did the SF feature requests go?
>> >
>> > And how can one cite/reference old SF requests?
>> >
>> > Can we please bring the SF stuff back, and put it
>> > in read-only mode, rather than nuking it?
>>
>> The feature requests were not imported into bugzilla
>> (I suspect we simply missed it). I personally don't
>> know if there a way to turn SF tracker into r/o mode,
>> i'll try.
>
> So they should be back now, but there is no ro mode,
> so I fear people might continue posting bugs and feature
> requests on SF :(

Yeah, there are options for auto responses as well as
extra text getting displayed on the tracker's webpage,
and you can restrict them to project members, but no
true read-only mode, it seems.

Also, full XML export seems to be limited to a project
admin [1].

How about importing all of the SF items into bugzilla,
and then just closing the SF presence down?

[1] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/XML%20export

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:54:11AM -0700, anonymous coward wrote:
> 
> Yeah, there are options for auto responses as well as
> extra text getting displayed on the tracker's webpage,
> and you can restrict them to project members, but no
> true read-only mode, it seems.
> 
> Also, full XML export seems to be limited to a project
> admin [1].
> 
> How about importing all of the SF items into bugzilla,
> and then just closing the SF presence down?
> 
> [1] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/XML%20export

Keith already did that for bugzilla. But it seems I missed moment
when we should close SF, so people continue posting there (a couple
of bug comments I think). So I guess nothing scary happen if we close
SF now, but feature requests were never imported so this may require
additional efforts (which for I can't spend time at moment).

Still if you have ability to export features and gimme back the
bugzilla format for it -- I would happily import it to bugzilla.nasm.us ;)

	Cyrill

>> Yeah, there are options for auto responses as well as
>> extra text getting displayed on the tracker's webpage,
>> and you can restrict them to project members, but no
>> true read-only mode, it seems.
>>
>> Also, full XML export seems to be limited to a project
>> admin [1].
>>
>> How about importing all of the SF items into bugzilla,
>> and then just closing the SF presence down?
>>
>> [1] https://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/XML%20export
>
> Keith already did that for bugzilla. But it seems I missed moment
> when we should close SF, so people continue posting there (a couple
> of bug comments I think). So I guess nothing scary happen if we close
> SF now, but feature requests were never imported so this may require
> additional efforts (which for I can't spend time at moment).
>
> Still if you have ability to export features and gimme back the
> bugzilla format for it -- I would happily import it to bugzilla.nasm.us ;)

XML export from SF requires admin permissions.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:48:45AM -0700, anonymous coward wrote:
> >
> > Still if you have ability to export features and gimme back the
> > bugzilla format for it -- I would happily import it to bugzilla.nasm.us ;)
> 
> XML export from SF requires admin permissions.

Crap, indeed. I managed to miss this fact. Well, I'll try to poke Keith
to grab the script he used for conversion.

	Cyrill

On 03/30/2012 01:57 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:48:45AM -0700, anonymous coward wrote:
>>>
>>> Still if you have ability to export features and gimme back the
>>> bugzilla format for it -- I would happily import it to bugzilla.nasm.us ;)
>>
>> XML export from SF requires admin permissions.
> 
> Crap, indeed. I managed to miss this fact. Well, I'll try to poke Keith
> to grab the script he used for conversion.
> 

Okay... how much is missing?  Specifically, what was the cutoff date?  I
have emails for all the changes, and the only ticket that has changed
all year is one called "PINSRB issue with 8-bit GPR".

I can also get Cyrill admin privs on SF.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 09:59:05AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/30/2012 01:57 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:48:45AM -0700, anonymous coward wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Still if you have ability to export features and gimme back the
> >>> bugzilla format for it -- I would happily import it to bugzilla.nasm.us ;)
> >>
> >> XML export from SF requires admin permissions.
> > 
> > Crap, indeed. I managed to miss this fact. Well, I'll try to poke Keith
> > to grab the script he used for conversion.
> > 
> 
> Okay... how much is missing?  Specifically, what was the cutoff date?  I
> have emails for all the changes, and the only ticket that has changed
> all year is one called "PINSRB issue with 8-bit GPR".
> 
> I can also get Cyrill admin privs on SF.
> 

There were a few bugs modification _after_ we've moved to bugzilla
but as far as I remember I tried to update the comments in bugzilla
manually to sync between SF and our bugzilla. But it was pain-in-ass
exercise, which mean I really don't wanna do it again ;)

What I can do -- I can re-check comments again tomorow and try to
figure out which of thme remained unsync'ed, ok?

As by feature requests -- they need to be imported into our bugzilla
(which I didn't managed yet).

	Cyrill

Thread: [Nasm-devel] SF tracker turned off

nasm-devel