From: Cyrill G. <gor...@gm...> - 2018-06-24 16:14:18
|
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:19 PM Taylor Holberton <tay...@gm...> wrote: > > Hello! > > I am writing you to give you the pleasure of knowing that you were right in saying that porting nasm to support another architecture would be a lot of work. > > Too much work. > > It looks like the assembler just wasn't built from the start to support more than a single architecture. Aside from that, the code is just too difficult to follow. Like many of the older C projects I've seen, there are just too many abbreviations, long winded functions, and larger than preferred files. I will say, though, that the documentation was a little helpful. > > Thank you for your replies and answering my questions. Hi! Indeed it is quite a task. And as far as I know we never been planning to support other archs that's why code structure is so coupled with x86. |