From: Cyrill G. <gor...@gm...> - 2017-08-29 09:14:54
|
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:58:47AM -0700, hp...@zy... wrote: > On August 29, 2017 1:55:16 AM PDT, Cyrill Gorcunov <gor...@gm...> wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:28:40AM -0700, hp...@zy... wrote: > >> > >> It's an imm64 from a syntactic POV. It's a *relative* imm32 on the > >hw level. > >Yes, but it might (and looks it is) give an impression that immediate 8 > >byte > >number if allowed here while it's only 4 bytes on hw level. > > That's how it works. OK. So I think we can close the bug report as wontfix then. |