From: Cyrill G. <gor...@gm...> - 2017-08-29 07:00:25
|
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 05:53:14PM -0700, hp...@zy... wrote: > On August 28, 2017 3:37:03 PM PDT, Cyrill Gorcunov <gor...@gm...> wrote: > >On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 01:08:59AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > >> > >> I see, indeed. Somehow missed it in first place. Thanks for > >explanation! > > > >Btw, there is no such thing as "call imm64" on binary level since the > >maximum immediate allowed is imm32 (which is sign extended then when > >executing). Maybe it worth to at least don't allow to pass 8 byte here > >on source code level? > > We don't...? I don't see what you mean here. I mean we have "CALL imm64" in our insns.dat while there is only imm32 allowed on machine level. |