Re: [Nasm-devel] clang patches

[H. P. A. <hp...@zy...>]

On 10/14/16 02:21, Daniel Lundqvist wrote:
>>
>> __has_attribute() sounds promising... do we have a presence test for that?
> 
> Yes, if __has_attribute is defined. Same mechanism for __has_feature.
> See http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#has-attribute and http://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#has-feature-and-has-extension for
> typical usage.
> 

Looks like gcc has this feature too in gcc 5+, so for newer attributes
it would totally be the thing to use.  I have checked in a patch to that
effect.

	-hpa