Re: [Nasm-devel] clang patches

[Daniel L. <da...@ma...>]

> On 8 Oct 2016, at 06:35, H. Peter Anvin <hp...@zy...> wrote:
> 
> On 10/07/16 06:46, Daniel Lundqvist wrote:
>> 
>> Unfortunately clang does not realise that 'again' will never be false
>> for non-glibc. How do you want that fixed? Is it OK to just
>> initialise f to NULL or do you prefer something else?
>> 
> 
> Setting f to NULL is fine.

Here is a patch for that.

-- 
daniel