Re: [Nasm-devel] clang patches

[H. P. A. <hp...@zy...>]

On 10/07/16 21:35, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
> What happens if you do, given that it defined __GNUC__ and therefore
> claims to be compatible with gcc?
> 

+#if defined(__clang__)
+# define never_null __attribute__((returns_nonnull))
+# define safe_alloc never_null __attribute__((malloc))
+# define safe_malloc(s)
+# define safe_malloc2(s1,s2)
+# define safe_realloc(s)

The latter should be safe_alloc and never_null as appropriate, though,
even if alloc_size() isn't defined.

Alternatively, we could define allocsize() as a macro... but that's
probably more trouble than it's worth.

	-hpa