Re: [Nasm-devel] clang patches

[H. P. A. <hp...@zy...>]

On 10/07/16 06:46, Daniel Lundqvist wrote:
> 
> Unfortunately clang does not realise that 'again' will never be false
> for non-glibc. How do you want that fixed? Is it OK to just
> initialise f to NULL or do you prefer something else?
> 

Setting f to NULL is fine.


>From fd764d58a7ada29f5121e275ee6b1c050c5f219f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Lundqvist <da...@ma...>
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 15:41:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] include/compiler.h: Adapt 'malloc' attributes for clang.

As clang does not support alloc_size attribute, don't try to use it.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lundqvist <da...@ma...>



What happens if you do, given that it defined __GNUC__ and therefore
claims to be compatible with gcc?

	-hpa