From: H. P. A. <hp...@zy...> - 2016-08-02 16:37:27
|
On 08/02/16 07:23, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 06:54:54AM -0700, anonymous coward wrote: >> >> I'm not sure what to try next -- nasmlib.a seems to contain the >> symbol, but somehow ld fails? > > I think --whole-archive option needed for ld > That would defeat the entire purpose with the library, though. After thinking about it, I decided to add the -fno-common compiler option (if supported.) Current NASM coding standard is to not use common data anyway, and that will help us spot mistakes. Hopefully that will work around the problem. -hpa |