Re: [Nasm-devel] Does it worth to carry rdoff format?

[<p1...@ja...>]

I see no reason to maintain an object format that is of very limited 
use, if even used at all.  Speaking solely from my own +30 years 
experience I'm +1 with dropping it - not that I have much say in the 
matter anyways. :)
Rob

On 5/9/2014 2:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/09/2014 09:20 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> At the moment I walking throught the sources looking for parts of code
>> which can be ripped off. One of them -- custom malloc/free tracker.
>> There are a bunch to memory trackers (valgrind and such) so I think
>> we don't need our trivial one.
>>
> By the way, thank you for looking into this.  Cruft accumulates in a
> code base over time.
>
> 	-hpa
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out:
> • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity
> • Requirements for releasing software faster
> • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce
> _______________________________________________
> Nasm-devel mailing list
> Nas...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nasm-devel
>