Re: [Nasm-devel] Does it worth to carry rdoff format?

[Cyrill G. <gor...@gm...>]

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 09:27:59AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/09/2014 09:20 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> >>
> >> We kind of have the same problem with NASM as with Linux... the only way
> >> to really find out what is being used is to break it...!
> > 
> > Well, we can try it then -- drop rdoff by _one_ commit, and if people
> > start complaing about it, we simply revert the commit.
> > 
> > At the moment I walking throught the sources looking for parts of code
> > which can be ripped off. One of them -- custom malloc/free tracker.
> > There are a bunch to memory trackers (valgrind and such) so I think
> > we don't need our trivial one.
> 
> I'm wondering how much problem it causes, though.  Doing some web
> searches seems to imply there are some scattered users out there.  We
> haven't spent a lot of time working on it for a very long time, so it
> doesn't seem to be causing problems, as far as I can tell.

You're talking about rdoff or mem-tracker? ;)