Re: [Nasm-devel] Does it worth to carry rdoff format?

[H. P. A. <hp...@zy...>]

On 05/09/2014 09:20 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>>
>> We kind of have the same problem with NASM as with Linux... the only way
>> to really find out what is being used is to break it...!
> 
> Well, we can try it then -- drop rdoff by _one_ commit, and if people
> start complaing about it, we simply revert the commit.
> 
> At the moment I walking throught the sources looking for parts of code
> which can be ripped off. One of them -- custom malloc/free tracker.
> There are a bunch to memory trackers (valgrind and such) so I think
> we don't need our trivial one.
> 

I'm wondering how much problem it causes, though.  Doing some web
searches seems to imply there are some scattered users out there.  We
haven't spent a lot of time working on it for a very long time, so it
doesn't seem to be causing problems, as far as I can tell.

	-hpa