From: anonymous c. <nas...@us...> - 2013-12-19 12:41:38
|
> [nosplit eax+eax] was encoded [eax*2] previously but > this seems against the user's intention. Actually, it is intentional/expected behavior. > So in this case, nosplit is ignored now and [eax+eax] will be generated. See my other reply to Peter for more detail. |