Re: [Nasm-devel] [nasm:master] mib: Handle MIB EA in a different way from regular EA's

[anonymous c. <nas...@us...>]

>> NOSPLIT specifier does not have an effect in mib, so [nosplit eax + eax*1]
>> will be encoded as [eax, eax] rather than [eax*2] as in a regular EA.
>
> I'm wondering if we shouldn't make NOSPLIT because exactly like this; I
> would think [nosplit eax + eax*1] should generate a base eax and index
> eax*1.  Anyone who would disagree with that opinion?

See the reply I just sent to your other message.