From: H. P. A. <hp...@zy...> - 2013-12-10 19:21:47
|
On 12/10/2013 11:13 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:02:00AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> >>> Thanks for report Dave! Crap, I thought man pages generation were resolved already. >>> As to compiler on OW, Peter, do we have a chance to narrow down what exactly is >>> broken there? >>> >> >> At least one is a blatant OW bug: >> >> if (n <= 0xFFFFFFFF) >> >> ... where n is a uint64_t, and OW claims it is always true. > > yes, I saw, and that's wondering me -- I mean I don't get why it is so. > I think OpenWatcom's handling of 64-bit numbers is just broken. It was introduced when interest in OW was already waning. -hpa |