Re: [Nasm-devel] NASM 2.11rc2

[H. P. A. <hp...@zy...>]

On 12/04/2013 08:33 PM, anonymous coward wrote:
>>> The newly added "[foo,bar]" syntax seems to be giving
>>> me trouble with some existing source code. I stand by
>>> what I said before -- I would like to see it gone, in favor
>>> of just the traditional comma-less "[foo+bar]" syntax.
>>
>> Could you give an example, perhaps?
> 
> I haven't had a chance yet to track it down -- all I know
> for now is that something fails as soon as that change
> is in the tree.

We'd really like something concrete here... it is almost impossible to
judge the importance of this without seeing something.

	-hpa