Re: [Nasm-devel] NASM 2.11rc2

[anonymous c. <nas...@us...>]

>> The newly added "[foo,bar]" syntax seems to be giving
>> me trouble with some existing source code. I stand by
>> what I said before -- I would like to see it gone, in favor
>> of just the traditional comma-less "[foo+bar]" syntax.
>
> Could you give an example, perhaps?

I haven't had a chance yet to track it down -- all I know
for now is that something fails as soon as that change
is in the tree.