From: Marat D. <ma...@gm...> - 2013-11-29 06:09:46
|
Some time ago I asked about a mechanism for fine-grained selection of instruction forms, which is similar to what you do with {evex}, {vec2} and {vec3} keywords. Here are the details: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.nasm.devel/3347 http://forum.nasm.us/index.php?topic=1517 Maybe you could implement selection between other forms (e.g. REX vs no-REX) as a part of your new selection mechanism? Regards, Marat On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Song, Jin Kyu <jin...@in...>wrote: > > > For instructions that can be encoded either in VEX or EVEX, > > > {evex} forces nasm to encode in EVEX. > > > > In addition to a per-instruction selection mechanism > > you also want a global selection mechanism, i.e. an > > assembler directive and a command line option. And > > as a result of that, you then want {vex} as well. > > Yes, adding {vex} - actually {vex2} and {vex3} - is on my to-do list. I > will implement that as soon as possible. A global selection mechanism is > now added to my to-do list. > > Thanks, > Jin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics > Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Nasm-devel mailing list > Nas...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nasm-devel > |