Re: [Nasm-devel] Instruction flags engine is merged upstream

[H. P. A. <hp...@zy...>]

Awesome, thanks!

"Song, Jin Kyu" <jin...@in...> wrote:
>I verified again Cyrill's new iflags engine works very well with all
>the AVX512 functionalities - including ndisasm. 
>
>Thanks,
>Jin
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Cyrill Gorcunov [mailto:gor...@gm...]
>> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 1:10 PM
>> To: H. Peter Anvin
>> Cc: nas...@li...; Song, Jin Kyu
>> Subject: Re: [Nasm-devel] Instruction flags engine is merged upstream
>> 
>> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 01:05:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> > On 11/24/2013 11:31 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hi Peter, sorry for delay, was out. Look, I can rollback my
>commits
>> > > restoring former master and move flags patches out of mainline to
>> > > a separate tree (just one revert for all commits, it'll be easy).
>> > > The reason I merged it into master was that -- without rebase
>I've
>> > > got a number of merge problems because of new IF_ flags
>introduced
>> > > into master, so the longer I stay out of mainline the harder it
>will
>> > > be to port back. But again, Peter, it's not a problem to revert,
>just
>> > > say a word ;)
>> >
>> > There is no reason to revert.  If it turns out to be a problem we
>can
>> > just fork a new branch off 305f3cee04d1adf3f4e335c5645814f2b67e8a69
>and
>> > then re-merge later.
>> 
>> OK, great. As far as I remember, Jin said the new engine is pretty
>fine
>> for him, still better to double check this moment.

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.