Re: [Nasm-devel] Instruction flags engine is merged upstream

[Song, J. K. <jin...@in...>]

I verified again Cyrill's new iflags engine works very well with all the AVX512 functionalities - including ndisasm. 

Thanks,
Jin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cyrill Gorcunov [mailto:gor...@gm...]
> Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 1:10 PM
> To: H. Peter Anvin
> Cc: nas...@li...; Song, Jin Kyu
> Subject: Re: [Nasm-devel] Instruction flags engine is merged upstream
> 
> On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 01:05:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 11/24/2013 11:31 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Peter, sorry for delay, was out. Look, I can rollback my commits
> > > restoring former master and move flags patches out of mainline to
> > > a separate tree (just one revert for all commits, it'll be easy).
> > > The reason I merged it into master was that -- without rebase I've
> > > got a number of merge problems because of new IF_ flags introduced
> > > into master, so the longer I stay out of mainline the harder it will
> > > be to port back. But again, Peter, it's not a problem to revert, just
> > > say a word ;)
> >
> > There is no reason to revert.  If it turns out to be a problem we can
> > just fork a new branch off 305f3cee04d1adf3f4e335c5645814f2b67e8a69 and
> > then re-merge later.
> 
> OK, great. As far as I remember, Jin said the new engine is pretty fine
> for him, still better to double check this moment.