Re: [Nasm-devel] Instruction flags engine is merged upstream

[Cyrill G. <gor...@gm...>]

On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 01:05:46PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/24/2013 11:31 AM, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Peter, sorry for delay, was out. Look, I can rollback my commits
> > restoring former master and move flags patches out of mainline to
> > a separate tree (just one revert for all commits, it'll be easy).
> > The reason I merged it into master was that -- without rebase I've
> > got a number of merge problems because of new IF_ flags introduced
> > into master, so the longer I stay out of mainline the harder it will
> > be to port back. But again, Peter, it's not a problem to revert, just
> > say a word ;)
> 
> There is no reason to revert.  If it turns out to be a problem we can
> just fork a new branch off 305f3cee04d1adf3f4e335c5645814f2b67e8a69 and
> then re-merge later.

OK, great. As far as I remember, Jin said the new engine is pretty fine
for him, still better to double check this moment.