From: Song, J. K. <jin...@in...> - 2013-08-28 10:33:29
|
> > > Why you've changed flags here and a couple of other places? > > > > The reason is actually written in the commit message. "Since they are > not bit masks, only one > > instruction set is allowed for each instruction." So both SSE and MMX > could not be set for > > one instruction. As nasm64developer mentioned in his email, this may not > be a proper way > > to expand and define bits for instruction sets. And it needs a major > restructuring of > > instruction flags not a simple fix of increasing data type size. > > Yes, feature flag is broken, i know. Can't such change affect existing > code? I thought this would not affect existing code because these feature flags were set to zero until now. The only place using this flag I could find was 'preferred disasm' part. So I slightly modified the mask bits to make it compatible with that part of code. Please correct me if I am wrong since I do not think I fully understood the whole code history of NASM. |