Re: [Nasm-devel] on fix for BR3414012

[Cyrill G. <gor...@gm...>]

On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 06:21:49PM -0500, Keith Kanios wrote:
> If I understand you correctly -- i.e.
> for(skip_white_(tline),tline,skip_white_(tline)) -- then that should
> be acceptable. %ifdef should never be allowed to be blank and thus
> should throw an error.
> 
> In short, yes, being consistent is more important than being concise.
> 
> Just my 2 ¢.
> 
> -Keith
> 

Yes, exactly. Thanks Keith!

	Cyrill