Note that said newer code implements %*, %%*, %%%*, etc.
instead of %*, %**, %***, etc. -- to ensure that there's
overall consistency: additional % characters result in a
reference to an outer loop (or macro).
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=804543
This addresses SF #629491.
Logged In: YES
user_id=804543
SF RFE #1241018 suggests %+0 and %-0 support,
which would require the changes from this RFE.
Logged In: YES
user_id=804543
See SF RFE #1365092 for newer code.
Note that said newer code implements %*, %%*, %%%*, etc.
instead of %*, %**, %***, etc. -- to ensure that there's
overall consistency: additional % characters result in a
reference to an outer loop (or macro).
Logged In: YES
user_id=804543
The newer code also fixes a core dump, which
otherwise occurs if %* expands into nothing,
and resides at the end of a line.
Logged In: YES
user_id=804543
Originator: YES
I have closed SF #626491 in favor of this one.