Menu

#262 Fix CPU flag for GETSEC

open-postponed
nobody
None
1
2007-11-20
2006-03-09
No

generic stuff
-------------

add SMX as a valid [CPU] flag

instruction database
--------------------

GETSEC void \2\x0F\x37 386,SMX

Discussion

  • nasm64developer

    nasm64developer - 2006-03-09

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=804543

    Attached find a macro version of GETSEC
    that accepts abstract "leaf" operands.

     
  • nasm64developer

    nasm64developer - 2006-03-09

    macro version of GETSEC that accepts abstract "leaf" operands

     
  • H. Peter Anvin

    H. Peter Anvin - 2007-09-23
    • status: open --> closed
     
  • H. Peter Anvin

    H. Peter Anvin - 2007-09-23

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=58697
    Originator: NO

    This has been implemented and checked into git, (http://repo.or.cz/w/nasm.git). It will be in the next version.

     
  • nasm64developer

    nasm64developer - 2007-10-22

    updated version

     
  • nasm64developer

    nasm64developer - 2007-10-22

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=804543
    Originator: YES

    Attached find an updated version of the macro.
    File Added: getsec.asm

     
  • nasm64developer

    nasm64developer - 2007-10-22
    • status: closed --> open
     
  • Nobody/Anonymous

    Logged In: NO

    GETSEC in 2.00rc2 is marked as KATMAI.
    This is incorrect.
    (Ideally it should be marked SMX.)

     
  • H. Peter Anvin

    H. Peter Anvin - 2007-11-20

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=58697
    Originator: NO

    Unfortunately, we're out of flags in the current scheme, and fixing it is out of scope for 2.00.

     
  • H. Peter Anvin

    H. Peter Anvin - 2007-11-20

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=58697
    Originator: NO

    Should be fixed post-2.00

     
  • H. Peter Anvin

    H. Peter Anvin - 2007-11-20
    • status: open --> open-postponed
     
  • H. Peter Anvin

    H. Peter Anvin - 2007-11-20
    • summary: add support for Intel SMX --> Fix CPU flag for GETSEC
     

Log in to post a comment.