Re: [Narf-lib-devel] fixed up windows test

[William L. A. <ba...@ac...>]

Patrick: I agree completely with getting rid of the warnings.
It's a pain in the butt on Windows; that OS really needs a "sudo"
command.

I commend your effort in making it really work on Windows. I don't
have a pure windows system here to help.

Bill

On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 10:07:31AM -0500, May, Patrick wrote:
> Bill,
>=20
> > Patrick: on my cygwin seup Narf continues to be free of errors. I=20
> > continue to filter the directory permission warnings from the Ruby=20
> > system() command using  ruby -W0
>=20
> I'm going to try and fix all of these.  I think most of these system calls
> are like this:
>=20
>     system("rm -Rf testdir")
>=20
> Another problem besides the permission warnings is that pure windows
> installs won't be able to test ruby.  I realized that I still had cygwin,
> and thus rm, on my machine.  These aren't big things to test, but I don't
> want someone to download narf to check it out and be scared away by a bun=
ch
> of failures that could have been easily fixed.
>=20
> Cheers,
>=20
> Patrick
>=20
>=20
> "This communication is intended solely for the addressee and is
> confidential and not for third party unauthorized distribution."
>=20