Re: [nant-dev] Back to atlassian code review?

[Ryan B. <rm...@gm...>]

Ok, I'll do it tonight and post the link once the diffs are posted.  Please let me know if you have questions/issues with the system.

Thanks,
Ryan

On May 25, 2011, at 12:18 PM, Dominik Guder <os...@gu...> wrote:

> Hi Ryan,
> 
> yes of course go ahead. I might try to put my "CreateInstance" proposal to fisheye too.
> 
> So far Dominik
> 
> Am 25.05.2011 02:52, schrieb Ryan Boggs:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Any thoughts on this?  I have a handful of diffs from Martin Aliger
>> that I would like you guys to review soon.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Ryan
>> 
>> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Ryan Boggs<rm...@gm...>  wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Since we are a group of more than 2, should we consider going back to
>>> using the atlassian code review that Charles setup awhile ago?  I know
>>> Gert had issues with it in the past but I do still see value to having
>>> something like this.  Thoughts?
>>> 
>>> https://fisheye1.atlassian.com/
> 
> -- 
> The answer to the great question of life,
> the universe and everything is 42 (Douglas Adams)