uC implementation does not match nanoIP draft

Brought to you by: msaarniv

#1 uC implementation does not match nanoIP draft

Status: open

Owner: nobody

Labels: None

Priority: 5

Updated: 2008-06-27

Created: 2008-06-27

Creator: Johannes Meyer

Private: No

The usage of the length field in NanoUDP does not match the description in draft-shelby-nanoIP-00.txt for fragmented packets. I did not review the TCP handling part so far.

Johannes

uC implementation does not match nanoIP draft

Group

Searches

Help

#1 uC implementation does not match nanoIP draft

Discussion