You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(18) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(11) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(42) |
Feb
(78) |
Mar
(144) |
Apr
(229) |
May
(407) |
Jun
(459) |
Jul
(532) |
Aug
(694) |
Sep
(844) |
Oct
(1357) |
Nov
(1036) |
Dec
(829) |
2003 |
Jan
(1419) |
Feb
(1212) |
Mar
(1220) |
Apr
(1208) |
May
(1063) |
Jun
(977) |
Jul
(901) |
Aug
(650) |
Sep
(690) |
Oct
(652) |
Nov
(771) |
Dec
(776) |
2004 |
Jan
(1085) |
Feb
(798) |
Mar
(1101) |
Apr
(808) |
May
(666) |
Jun
(768) |
Jul
(838) |
Aug
(961) |
Sep
(1021) |
Oct
(864) |
Nov
(916) |
Dec
(608) |
2005 |
Jan
(881) |
Feb
(774) |
Mar
(1014) |
Apr
(956) |
May
(871) |
Jun
(814) |
Jul
(749) |
Aug
(807) |
Sep
(754) |
Oct
(951) |
Nov
(763) |
Dec
(616) |
2006 |
Jan
(709) |
Feb
(781) |
Mar
(730) |
Apr
(629) |
May
(778) |
Jun
(572) |
Jul
(770) |
Aug
(747) |
Sep
(497) |
Oct
(467) |
Nov
(669) |
Dec
(514) |
2007 |
Jan
(765) |
Feb
(508) |
Mar
(517) |
Apr
(574) |
May
(561) |
Jun
(613) |
Jul
(552) |
Aug
(603) |
Sep
(506) |
Oct
(781) |
Nov
(731) |
Dec
(457) |
2008 |
Jan
(861) |
Feb
(590) |
Mar
(602) |
Apr
(652) |
May
(633) |
Jun
(696) |
Jul
(602) |
Aug
(591) |
Sep
(557) |
Oct
(541) |
Nov
(602) |
Dec
(406) |
2009 |
Jan
(601) |
Feb
(693) |
Mar
(810) |
Apr
(765) |
May
(685) |
Jun
(678) |
Jul
(669) |
Aug
(488) |
Sep
(547) |
Oct
(411) |
Nov
(421) |
Dec
(249) |
2010 |
Jan
(348) |
Feb
(366) |
Mar
(636) |
Apr
(339) |
May
(283) |
Jun
(253) |
Jul
(285) |
Aug
(358) |
Sep
(330) |
Oct
(345) |
Nov
(305) |
Dec
(361) |
2011 |
Jan
(287) |
Feb
(342) |
Mar
(286) |
Apr
(202) |
May
(260) |
Jun
(329) |
Jul
(289) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(163) |
Oct
(154) |
Nov
(182) |
Dec
(202) |
2012 |
Jan
(160) |
Feb
(193) |
Mar
(182) |
Apr
(160) |
May
(253) |
Jun
(155) |
Jul
(146) |
Aug
(175) |
Sep
(136) |
Oct
(186) |
Nov
(130) |
Dec
(84) |
2013 |
Jan
(98) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(84) |
May
(112) |
Jun
(94) |
Jul
(100) |
Aug
(139) |
Sep
(87) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Marco B. <m.b...@it...> - 2013-09-03 10:53:29
|
Hi all I need to control many UDP ports. I run the command: ./check_udp H <IP_ADDRESS> p 88 I receive following error message (with state UNKNOWN) : With UDP checks, a send/expect string must be specified Can anyone help me to solve it? Those parameters should be optional.. regards Marco Borsani Unix and Monitoring Sysadmin Business Unit Internet Solutions - Operations tel: +39 010 4310115 fax: +39 02 30130311 cell: +39 329 5953944 ITnet S.r.l. Società con socio unico Soggetta a direzione e coordinamento di Italiaonline S.r.l. |
From: FTL N. <ftl...@gm...> - 2013-09-03 09:33:56
|
Hi, On the Host Groups Overview page - is it possible to custom arrange the hostgroups displayed rather than by the default of alphabetically, by editing some file? Thanks |
From: FTL N. <ftl...@gm...> - 2013-09-03 09:21:07
|
Hi, On the Host Groups Overview page - is it possible to custom arrange the hostgroups displayed rather than by the default of alphabetically, by editing some file? Thanks |
From: Paul M D. <wo...@pa...> - 2013-09-03 03:13:23
|
Alex Flex wrote: > Hello. Thank you for this,definately it looks like the solution for > me.. although mk-livestatus looks much unknown . > > Alex Maybe Nagios BPI will also work for you. http://exchange.nagios.org/directory/Addons/Components/Nagios-Business-Process-Intelligence-%28BPI%29/details |
From: Alex F. <afl...@gm...> - 2013-09-02 20:29:22
|
Hello. Thank you for this,definately it looks like the solution for me.. although mk-livestatus looks much unknown . Alex |
From: Paul S. <pau...@on...> - 2013-09-02 11:50:59
|
Hello Has anyone developed a check to confirm that Ziproxy (useful compression proxy) is running (under xinetd)? I would like to use a standard plugin if possible, I have been playing with the 'check_http' but without success. Regards Paul ________________________________ Disclaimer: This e-mail (and any attachments to it) is confidential and intended solely for the named person/s to whom it is addressed. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete the email from your system. Any review, dissemination or other use of it in these circumstances is prohibited. |
From: William L. <wi...@le...> - 2013-09-02 07:19:38
|
night: archiving and zipping of logs On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Kaushal Shriyan <kau...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to know what caused load issue on a specific time period. > For example lets say the load critical alert by nagios during night time > period. How do i debug? I know of top utility but not sure if it stores > historical data. Please suggest and any recommendations to optimize the > thresholds for Load service based on best practices. > > Regards, > > Kaushal > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > Nag...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when > reporting any issue. > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > |
From: Kaushal S. <kau...@gm...> - 2013-09-02 05:49:32
|
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Daniel Wittenberg < dwi...@gm...> wrote: > We have no idea what OS, I'm assuming some Unix/Linux, so going throw out > to look at sar, maybe it's installed and running and might help, but > without more info it's really hard for us to guess. > > Dan > > Hi Dan, Thanks for the reply. Apologies for not furnishing more info. I am running CentOS Linux version 6.4 Regards, Kaushal > > On Sep 2, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Kaushal Shriyan <kau...@gm...> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Is there a way to know what caused load issue on a specific time period. > For example lets say the load critical alert by nagios during night time > period. How do i debug? I know of top utility but not sure if it stores > historical data. Please suggest and any recommendations to optimize the > thresholds for Load service based on best practices. > > > > Regards, > > > > Kaushal > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft > technologies > > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > > Nagios-users mailing list > > Nag...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when > reporting any issue. > > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > Nag...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when > reporting any issue. > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > |
From: Jonathan A. <eag...@gm...> - 2013-09-02 05:44:41
|
If i am not mistaken something like cacti would be good to monitor such data in terms of the time period when there was the load etc. On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Kaushal Shriyan <kau...@gm...>wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to know what caused load issue on a specific time period. > For example lets say the load critical alert by nagios during night time > period. How do i debug? I know of top utility but not sure if it stores > historical data. Please suggest and any recommendations to optimize the > thresholds for Load service based on best practices. > > Regards, > > Kaushal > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > Nag...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when > reporting any issue. > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null > -- Jonathan Aquilina |
From: Daniel W. <dwi...@gm...> - 2013-09-02 05:38:54
|
We have no idea what OS, I'm assuming some Unix/Linux, so going throw out to look at sar, maybe it's installed and running and might help, but without more info it's really hard for us to guess. Dan On Sep 2, 2013, at 12:25 AM, Kaushal Shriyan <kau...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way to know what caused load issue on a specific time period. For example lets say the load critical alert by nagios during night time period. How do i debug? I know of top utility but not sure if it stores historical data. Please suggest and any recommendations to optimize the thresholds for Load service based on best practices. > > Regards, > > Kaushal > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > Nag...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null |
From: Kaushal S. <kau...@gm...> - 2013-09-02 05:25:48
|
Hi, Is there a way to know what caused load issue on a specific time period. For example lets say the load critical alert by nagios during night time period. How do i debug? I know of top utility but not sure if it stores historical data. Please suggest and any recommendations to optimize the thresholds for Load service based on best practices. Regards, Kaushal |
From: Páll G. S. <pa...@ok...> - 2013-08-31 23:00:41
|
I made something the other day that might help you. check_nagios_services is a plugin that checks the current of other nagios services (via mk-livestatus) and you can set threshold, for example if one of many http checks are critical, return critical as well. Maybe you can use that as a basis to solve your problem. https://github.com/palli/monitor-iceland/blob/master/nagios-plugins/check_nagios_services ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex Flex" <afl...@gm...> To: "Nagios Users List" <nag...@li...> Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 10:19:34 PM Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Is it possible to recieve a single global notification for all checks? Hello Steve, On 08/31/2013 03:41 PM, steve f wrote: I've built a few checks that monitor say 5 partitions or ping 5 ip addresses and will report back if one or more are down. results line says 1 is ok, 2 is ok, 3 is down,,, etc. Is that what you are looking for? Your solution was to create a single check that at the same time performs various checks, similar to the check_multi . However I need each check to be an independent check :( Any other suggestion is appreciated. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Nagios-users mailing list Nag...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null |
From: Alex F. <afl...@gm...> - 2013-08-31 22:19:42
|
Hello Steve, On 08/31/2013 03:41 PM, steve f wrote: > I've built a few checks that monitor say 5 partitions or ping 5 ip > addresses and will report back if one or more are down. results line > says 1 is ok, 2 is ok, 3 is down,,, etc. > > Is that what you are looking for? Your solution was to create a single check that at the same time performs various checks, similar to the check_multi . However I need each check to be an independent check :( Any other suggestion is appreciated. |
From: Alex F. <afl...@gm...> - 2013-08-31 22:07:51
|
Hello, Iam trying to use a global handler so that it invokes a failover by distinguishing first if the host is CRITICAL, if its then it should failover all services under that host and ignore the number of services of that particular host in trouble and NOT try to failover specific services. If specific services of that host are in trouble AND the host state is OK then it should failover only the specific services. Is this something that can be achieved by a global host handler? If yes how? according to what i read i cannot pass specific service arguments to the global handler. It only gets fed the nagios macros so it cannot distinguish what action to take according to the circumstances. Alex |
From: steve f <a31...@ho...> - 2013-08-31 21:41:38
|
I've built a few checks that monitor say 5 partitions or ping 5 ip addresses and will report back if one or more are down. results line says 1 is ok, 2 is ok, 3 is down,,, etc. Is that what you are looking for? I could send the check to you on Tues when I am back in work > Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 14:17:19 -0600 > From: afl...@gm... > To: nag...@li... > Subject: [Nagios-users] Is it possible to recieve a single global notification for all checks? > > Hello Nginx, > > I have a single host, and dozens of services of the same type (http > check) monitored. > > When a service goes down it is normal for others to report CRITICAL at > the same time. Intead of generating a notification for each independant > service can I have a SINGLE email consolidate the report on whats on > CRITICAL? > > Perhaps using a global handler, however how would this work with the > part of one email per minute if my understanding is that the global > event handler runs independtly for each service? > > Anything creative is welcome. > > Alex > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! > Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies > and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step > tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Nagios-users mailing list > Nag...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nagios-users > ::: Please include Nagios version, plugin version (-v) and OS when reporting any issue. > ::: Messages without supporting info will risk being sent to /dev/null |
From: Alex F. <afl...@gm...> - 2013-08-31 20:17:28
|
Hello Nginx, I have a single host, and dozens of services of the same type (http check) monitored. When a service goes down it is normal for others to report CRITICAL at the same time. Intead of generating a notification for each independant service can I have a SINGLE email consolidate the report on whats on CRITICAL? Perhaps using a global handler, however how would this work with the part of one email per minute if my understanding is that the global event handler runs independtly for each service? Anything creative is welcome. Alex |
From: <mw...@be...> - 2013-08-30 02:32:38
|
Ich kehre zurück am 16.09.2013. Ich werde Ihre Nachricht nach meiner Rückkehr schnellstmöglich beantworten. Hinweis: Dies ist eine automatische Antwort auf Ihre Nachricht "[Nagios-users] check_openmanage whitelist feature request" gesendet am 30.08.2013 00:00:17. Diese ist die einzige Benachrichtigung, die Sie empfangen werden, während diese Person abwesend ist. |
From: Prado, D. <dav...@ex...> - 2013-08-29 22:19:17
|
Hello Trond, First of all, I want to thank you for the excellent plugin and continued support and development. The purpose of this is to suggest including a whitelist option to do the opposite of the blacklist option. This will allow anyone to create checks with higher granularity. For example, something like # check_openmanage -s -H myhost --only storage --whitelist vdisk=0:1 would allow me to check status of an individual vdisk. Thanks, --- David Prado |
From: Paul D. <wo...@pa...> - 2013-08-29 17:31:54
|
Watanabe, Yu wrote: > Hi all! > > I would like to share ideas for web transaction monitoring for nagios. > > I believe that there are couple of ways to implement this on nagios. > > http://jon.netdork.net/2011/03/19/using-nagios-to-monitor-webpages/ > > We use check_website.pl because its simple. > > What does everyone else use for this specific monitoring? > > Thanks, > > Yu > I've used the check_webinject plugin with good results. The best place to get it is here: http://labs.consol.de/lang/en/nagios/check_webinject/ |
From: Jim A. <ji...@ji...> - 2013-08-29 16:30:52
|
On 29 Aug 2013 02:46, "Mark Campbell" <mc...@ps...> wrote: > > So I need to utilize some logic in my service checks. > > I have a chiller that if it is not running the discharge temp is not of > concern. However if it is running the discharge temp needs to be lower > than 50 degrees. > > Is there a way to have the check snmp utilize some logic that says if > running = 0 then ignore discharge temp. If running = 1 then discharge > temp must be <50 degrees? Yes, I did something similar recently where I wanted to check for existence of an orphaned file only if ftp failed on another server. The command definition looked like this: define command { command_name check-for-orphan command_line if $USER1$/check_ftp -H $ARG1$ $ARG2$ $USER10$ then $USER1$/check_multi -s $HOSTADDRESS$ $ARG3$ $USER10$ else exit 0 $USER10$ fi register 1 } Obviously you won't be using check_ftp and check_multi (probably check_snmp or your own custom plugins instead) but hopefully you can see now how you can do something similar to run the second check only if the first returns an ok state (I'm presuming your first check will return an ok state if running=1 and the second returns ok if temperature < 50 degrees). Where you see $USER10$ here, that refers to a macro in your /usr/local/nagios/etc/resource.cfg file that gives you a semi-colon like so: $USER10$=; It's a bit of a kludge to allow you to have a multi-line command in a Nagios command definition. Note that during the time that the first check returns a non-ok state, the service check will be in an OK state (the exit 0) but will have null output. I guess you could put another line with echo "something" in there if you want it to say something meaningful. I hope that makes some sense... By the way, please don't blame me if this method breaks in some future version of Nagios - I'm using 3.3.1 on this one. Cheers, Jim |
From: Mark C. <mc...@ps...> - 2013-08-29 01:27:54
|
So I need to utilize some logic in my service checks. I have a chiller that if it is not running the discharge temp is not of concern. However if it is running the discharge temp needs to be lower than 50 degrees. Is there a way to have the check snmp utilize some logic that says if running = 0 then ignore discharge temp. If running = 1 then discharge temp must be <50 degrees? THe other option I thought of was using dependencies. Anyone have suggestions on that? |
From: Watanabe, Y. <yu....@jp...> - 2013-08-29 00:41:41
|
Hi all! I would like to share ideas for web transaction monitoring for nagios. I believe that there are couple of ways to implement this on nagios. http://jon.netdork.net/2011/03/19/using-nagios-to-monitor-webpages/ We use check_website.pl because its simple. What does everyone else use for this specific monitoring? Thanks, Yu |
From: C. B. <be...@be...> - 2013-08-28 13:34:31
|
> On 8/28/13 14:43, C. Bensend wrote: >> Are you saying I just need gearmand running on the collector? > > Well, i assumed it. You are the only one which really can tell that. > You will need a worker on each host which should run checks. If your > collector should not run any checks, than no worker is necessary. > > See http://labs.consol.de/nagios/mod-gearman/#_common_scenarios for a list > of common setups. OK, yes, I grok that. I guess I would want the collector to be *able* to run checks, if it doesn't get timely information from the pollers. I'm assuming that's why it's even trying in the first place - it doesn't see a result in a timely manner, so it thinks it should run one. Which circles back to my original question - why can't it run the check? Why isn't it finding what it needs to find? The workers are running as the nagios user, and I don't see anything that appears pertinent in the mod_gearman_worker.conf file... What am I missing? Neither the gearmand.log nor the mod_gearman_worker.log files seem to have any complaints (but I haven't bumped up the debug on them yet). Thanks so much for your help! Benny -- "No matter how tempted I am with the prospect of unlimited power, I will not consume any energy field bigger than my head." -- #22 on Peter Anspach's Evil Overlord list |
From: Sven N. <Sve...@Co...> - 2013-08-28 13:07:45
|
On 8/28/13 14:43, C. Bensend wrote: > Are you saying I just need gearmand running on the collector? Well, i assumed it. You are the only one which really can tell that. You will need a worker on each host which should run checks. If your collector should not run any checks, than no worker is necessary. See http://labs.consol.de/nagios/mod-gearman/#_common_scenarios for a list of common setups. Sven |
From: C. B. <be...@be...> - 2013-08-28 12:43:34
|
> On 8/22/13 13:51, C. Bensend wrote: >> CRITICAL: Return code of 127 is out of bounds. Make sure the plugin >> youre trying to run actually exists. (worker: collector.domain.org) > > Hi, > > if this is the collector host, why does it have a mod-gearman worker > installed? If nagios would have > run the check by itself, there would be no hint about the worker in the > error. So it seems like there > is a worker started on your collector host which then grabs some checks > but isn't able to execute them. Oh ho! I have multiple *gearman* processes running: ps axuwwwwww | grep gearman gearmand 5662 0.7 0.1 404672 2496 ? Ssl Aug17 118:29 /usr/sbin/gearmand -d -l /var/log/gearmand/gearmand.log nagios 5712 0.0 0.0 38024 640 ? Ss Aug17 1:03 /usr/bin/mod_gearman_worker -d --config=/etc/mod_gearman/mod_gearman_worker.conf --pidfile=/var/mod_gearman/mod_gearman_worker.pid nagios 25919 0.0 0.1 137492 3016 ? S 07:38 0:00 /usr/bin/mod_gearman_worker -d --config=/etc/mod_gearman/mod_gearman_worker.conf --pidfile=/var/mod_gearman/mod_gearman_worker.pid .. etc .. Are you saying I just need gearmand running on the collector? I'm quite new to gearman, so I might have misunderstood which parts are necessary where. I can easily shut down the mod_gearman_worker service, I just need to understand the consequences. I assumed that this was a Nagios error - perhaps I just have my gearman setup configured wrong. Benny -- "No matter how tempted I am with the prospect of unlimited power, I will not consume any energy field bigger than my head." -- #22 on Peter Anspach's Evil Overlord list |