Re: [Nagios-db-devel] Re: patch to current CVS

[Ben <be...@si...>]

Thanks S=E9bastien, I'm applying these to CVS right now. Well, except =20=

for the change to use NEBCALLBACK_PROCESS_DATA instead of =20
NEBCALLBACK_TIMED_EVENT_DATA. In the past, I purposely stopped using =20
PROCESS_DATA. I haven't time recently to work on Nagios or pay much =20
attention to checkins, but have things changed to make the =20
TIMED_EVENT_DATA callback point unacceptable? If so, how?

On Nov 24, 2005, at 6:36 AM, S=E9bastien Barbereau wrote:

> Hi list,
> here is a patch to the current CVS revision of nagios-db for =20
> postgres. This patch does:
> * correct a bug on startup concerning neb_register_callback command =20=

> change
> * add some logging messages to help debugging
> * correct a small typo in handling options (see "offset bugs in =20
> option parsing" http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?=20
> msg_id=3D12557459 )
> * modified neb initialisation so that 'processStart' is called when =20=

> Nagios starts and not when we have a NEBCALLBACK_TIMED_EVENT_DATA . =20=

> The problem was that processStart() was called berfore the nagios =20
> configuration was loaded and therefor processStart() did not have =20
> configuration data available.
>
> good luck.
> Seb.B
>
> forgot the file :)
>
> <inserter.c.patch>